Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24424441›Full record

ReviewMolecular and cellular endocrinology2014

Non-feminizing estrogens: a novel neuroprotective therapy.

Ashley B Petrone, Joshua W Gatson, James W Simpkins, Miranda N Reed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular and cellular endocrinology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Non-Feminizing Estrogens Do Not Exhibit Antidepressant-like Activity.Journal of pharmaceutics and drug research · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashley B PetroneDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, United States; Center for Basic and Translational Stroke Research, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Joshua W GatsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, United States.
James W SimpkinsDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, United States; Center for Basic and Translational Stroke Research, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Miranda N ReedCenter for Basic and Translational Stroke Research, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States; Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States. Electronic address: Miranda.Reed@mail.wvu.edu.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Laura F. Gibson · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
Protein Targets of Oxidative Brain AgingP01AG022550 · NIA · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI SIMPKINS, JAMES W. · 2003 to 2013
$15.7M
ROLE OF MITHOCHONDRIAL ERB IN NEURONAL VULNDERABILITY TO NEUROTOXIC STRESSP01AG027956 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI SINGH, MEHARVAN · 2007 to 2017
$11.3M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG022550NIA NIH HHS P01 AG027956NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942NIGMS NIH HHS U54GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the conflict between basic science evidence for estrogen neuroprotection and the lack of effectiveness in clinical trials is only now being resolved, it is clear that strategies for estrogen neuroprotection that avoid activation of ERs have the potential for clinical application. Herein we review the evidence from both in vitro and in vivo studies that describe high potency neuroprotection with non-feminizing estrogens. We have characterized many of the essential chemical features of non-feminizing estrogens that eliminate or reduce ER binding while maintaining or enhancing neuroprotection. Additionally, we provide evidence that these non-feminizing estrogens have efficacy in protecting the brain from AD neuropathology and traumatic brain injury. In conclusion, it appears that the non-feminizing estrogen strategy for neuroprotection is a viable option to achieve the beneficial neuroprotective effects of estrogens while eliminating the toxic off-target effects of chronic estrogen administration.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAnimalsBrainClinical Trials as TopicEstrogensFemaleHumansMaleNeuroprotective AgentsReceptors, EstrogenEstrogensNeuroprotective AgentsReceptors, EstrogenAlzheimer’s diseaseEstradiolEstrogen receptorsNeuroprotectionNon-feminizing estrogensTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID24424441
PMCPMC4040321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.