ArticleJournal of interpersonal violence2014
"I Just Keep My Antennae Out": How Rural Primary Care Physicians Respond to Intimate Partner Violence.
Article in Journal of interpersonal violence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Elements of Effective Interventions for Addressing Intimate Partner Violence in Latina Women: A Systematic Review.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Clinicians' Decisions to Screen for Intimate Partner Violence Use and Experience and Observed Impacts: Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Rural/urban differences in rates and predictors of intimate partner violence and abuse screening among pregnant and postpartum United States residents.Health services research · 2024Article
- Adherence to behavioural intervention in RCT study by the women experiencing domestic violence and attending ANC in a public hospital in India-an analysis.Dialogues in health · 2023Article
- Interprofessional collaboration to support patients with social problems in general practice-a qualitative focus group study.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Health practitioners' perceptions of structural barriers to the identification of intimate partner abuse: a qualitative meta-synthesis.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Intimate Partner Violence Experienced by Adults With Diagnosed HIV in the U.S.American journal of preventive medicine · 2021Article
- Intimate partner violence management and referral practices of primary care workers in a selected population in Turkey.Primary health care research & development · 2019Article
- Intimate partner violence discussions in the healthcare setting: A cross-sectional study.Preventive medicine reports · 2017Article
- Assessing Crisis Pregnancy Centers' Capacity for Supporting Perinatal Clients with Social Complexity in Rural Maternal Health Care Shortage Areas.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Women in rural communities who are exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV) have fewer resources when seeking help due to limited health services, poverty, and social isolation. Rural primary care physicians may be key sources of care for IPV victims. The objective of this study was to assess the opinions and practices of primary care physicians caring for rural women with regard to IPV identification, the scope and severity of IPV as a health problem, how primary care providers respond to IPV in their practices, and barriers to optimized IPV care in their communities. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 19 internists, family practitioners, and obstetrician-gynecologists in rural central Pennsylvania. Interview transcripts were analyzed for major themes. Most physicians did not practice routine screening for IPV due to competing time demands, lack of training, limited access to referral services as well as low confidence in their effectiveness, and concern that inquiry would harm the patient-doctor relationship. IPV was considered when patients presented with symptoms of mood, anxiety, or somatic disorders. Responses to IPV included validation, danger assessment, safety planning, referral, and follow-up planning. Perceived barriers to rural women seeking help for IPV included traditional gender roles, lower education, economic dependence on the partner, low self-esteem, and patient reluctance to discuss IPV. To overcome barriers, physicians created a "safe sanctuary" to discuss IPV and suggested improved public health education and referral services. Interventions to improve IPV-related care in rural communities should address barriers at multiple levels, including both physicians' and patients' comfort with discussing IPV. Provider training, community education, and improved access to referral services are key areas in which IPV-related care should be improved in rural communities. Our data support routine screening to better identify IPV and a more pro-active stance toward screening and counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.