Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24423981›Full record

ReviewEndocrine reviews2014

Adverse health consequences of performance-enhancing drugs: an Endocrine Society scientific statement.

Harrison G Pope, Ruth I Wood, Alan Rogol, Fred Nyberg, Larry Bowers, Shalender Bhasin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 205 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
205citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

205 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Erythropoiesis-Targeted Doping in Sports: From Improved Oxygen Transport to Cardiovascular Risk.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

145 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Harrison G PopeMcLean Hospital (H.G.P.), Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts 02478; University of Southern California (R.I.W.), Los Angeles, California 90089; University of Virginia (A.R.), Charlottesville, Virginia 22904; Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, (F.N.), Upsala University, SE-751 24, Upsala, Sweden; United States Anti-Doping Agency (L.B.), Colorado Springs, Colorado 80919; and Brigham and Women's Hospital (S.B.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Ruth I Wood
Alan Rogol
Fred Nyberg
Larry Bowers
Shalender Bhasin

Funding

TESTOSTERONE SUPPLEMENTATION FOR MEN WITH SARCOPENIAU01AG014369 · NIA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI BHASIN, SHALENDER · 2005 to 2011
$4.6M
Anabolic-androgenic steroids promote risky decision makingR01DA029613 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JAKOWEC, MICHAEL WALTER, WOOD, RUTH I. · 2011 to 2019
$2.9M
Medical Consequences of Long-Term Anabolic-Androgenic Steroid AbuseR01DA029141 · NIDA · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI POPE, HARRISON G · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
Mechanisms of Testosterone ActionR01AG037193 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BHASIN, SHALENDER · 2010 to 2014
$2.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG037193NIA NIH HHS U01 AG014369NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029141NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the high prevalence of performance-enhancing drug (PED) use, media attention has focused almost entirely on PED use by elite athletes to illicitly gain a competitive advantage in sports, and not on the health risks of PEDs. There is a widespread misperception that PED use is safe or that adverse effects are manageable. In reality, the vast majority of PED users are not athletes but rather nonathlete weightlifters, and the adverse health effects of PED use are greatly underappreciated. This scientific statement synthesizes available information on the medical consequences of PED use, identifies gaps in knowledge, and aims to focus the attention of the medical community and policymakers on PED use as an important public health problem. PED users frequently consume highly supraphysiologic doses of PEDs, combine them with other PEDs and/or other classical drugs of abuse, and display additional associated risk factors. PED use has been linked to an increased risk of death and a wide variety of cardiovascular, psychiatric, metabolic, endocrine, neurologic, infectious, hepatic, renal, and musculoskeletal disorders. Because randomized trials cannot ethically duplicate the large doses of PEDs and the many factors associated with PED use, we need observational studies to collect valid outcome data on the health risks associated with PEDs. In addition, we need studies regarding the prevalence of PED use, the mechanisms by which PEDs exert their adverse health effects, and the interactive effects of PEDs with sports injuries and other high-risk behaviors. We also need randomized trials to assess therapeutic interventions for treating the adverse effects of PEDs, such as the anabolic-androgen steroid withdrawal syndrome. Finally, we need to raise public awareness of the serious health consequences of PEDs.

Indexed as

Anabolic AgentsAndrogensErythropoietinHuman Growth HormoneHumansInsulinPerformance-Enhancing SubstancesSocieties, MedicalAnabolic AgentsAndrogensErythropoietinHuman Growth HormoneInsulinPerformance-Enhancing Substances

Identifiers

PMID24423981
PMCPMC4026349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.