Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24423847›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2014

A novel approach for superficial intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) using a 50 kV X-ray source: a technical and case report.

Frank Schneider, Sven Clausen, Johannes Thölking, Frederik Wenz, Yasser Abo-Madyan

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recommendations of the Spanish brachytherapy group (GEB) of Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and the Spanish Society of Medical Physics (SEFM) for high-dose rate (HDR) non melanoma skin cancer brachytherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of dose distribution of an intraoperative radiotherapy device using thermoluminescent dosimeters and radiographic films.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. System and path planning algorithm for low-kV X-ray free-form surface irradiation.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Present state and issues in IORT Physics.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Optimum radiation source for radiation therapy of skin cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Frank SchneiderUniversity of Heidelberg. frank.schneider@umm.de.
Sven Clausen
Johannes Thölking
Frederik Wenz
Yasser Abo-Madyan
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of IORT as a treatment modality for patients with close or positive margins has increased over the past decade. For situations where a flat area (up to 6 cm in diameter) has to be treated intraoperatively, new applicators for superficial treatment with a miniature X-ray source (INTRABEAM system) were developed. Here we report our evaluation of the dosimetric characteristics of these new applicators and their first clinical use. Each of these flat and surface applicators consists of a radiation protective metal tube and a flattening filter, which converts the spherical dose distribution of the X-ray source into a flat one. The homogeneity of each dose distribution and depth-dose measurements were evaluated using film dosimetry in a solid water phantom and a soft X-ray ionization chamber in a water tank. The first patient was treated with 5 Gy delivered in 5 mm using a 4 cm FLAT applicator over 21 minutes. The flat applicators show the maximum homogeneity, with a uniformity ratio of 1.02-1.08 in certain depths. In 1 mm depth surface applicators show a uniformity ratio of 1.15-1.28. They also show a higher dose rate and a steeper dose gradient compared to the flat applicators. The results of this investigation demonstrated that the flat and surface applicators have unique dosimetric characteristics that need to be considered during the treatment planning stages. This work also showed that it is possible to perform a superficial localized IORT which provides new application possibilities for use of the INTRABEAM system.

Indexed as

MastectomyAgedBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansIntraoperative PeriodMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrognosisRadiotherapy DosageX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID24423847
PMCPMC5711231
OpenAlexW1610498753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.