ReviewAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2014
Comparative outcomes between continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis: a narrative review.
Review in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05449067 (Nocturnal Automated Versus Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Nocturnal Automated Versus Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Non-Inferiority Trial
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of outcomes of incremental vs. standard peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC nephrology · 2024Pooled it
- Automated peritoneal dialysis versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for people with kidney failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Blood pressure and volume management in dialysis: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference.Kidney international · 2020Guideline
- Trial
- Trial
- Peritoneal Dialysis Modality and Outcomes in the Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Outcome of Peritonitis in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: A Cohort Study.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of peritoneal dialysis strategy on technique and patient survival.Clinical kidney journal · 2023Article
- Article
- Delivering Personalized, Goal-Directed Care to Older Patients Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Severe infections in peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients: An inception cohort study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Feasibility of a break-in period of less than 24 hours for urgent start peritoneal dialysis: a multicenter study.Renal failure · 2022Article
- Article
- Comparison of various indices for predicting sarcopenia and its components in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A comparative analysis of ambulatory BP profile and arterial stiffness between CAPD and APD.Journal of human hypertension · 2022Article
- Treatment practices and outcomes in incident peritoneal dialysis patients: the Swedish Renal Registry 2006-2015.Clinical kidney journal · 2021Article
- Continuation of Peritoneal Dialysis in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients With Delayed Graft Function.Kidney international reports · 2021Article
- Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: Patient Perspectives and Outcomes.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2021Review
- Phosphate clearance in peritoneal dialysis.Scientific reports · 2020Observational
- Challenges in the provision of kidney care at the largest public nephrology center in Guatemala: a qualitative study with health professionals.BMC nephrology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Automated methods for delivering peritoneal dialysis (PD) to persons with end-stage renal disease continue to gain popularity worldwide, particularly in developed countries. However, the endeavor to automate the PD process has not been advanced on the strength of high-level evidence for superiority of automated over manual methods. This article summarizes available studies that have shed light on the evidence that compares the association of treatment with continuous ambulatory PD or automated PD (APD) with clinically meaningful outcomes. Published evidence, primarily from observational studies, has been unable to demonstrate a consistent difference in residual kidney function loss rate, peritonitis rate, maintenance of euvolemia, technique survival, mortality, or health-related quality of life in individuals undergoing continuous ambulatory PD versus APD. At the same time, the future of APD technology appears ripe for further improvement, such as the incorporation of voice commands and expanded use of telemedicine. Given these considerations, it appears that patient choice should drive the decision about PD modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.