ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2014
Long term outcomes for women treated for cervical precancer.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative effectiveness and risk of preterm birth of local treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and stage IA1 cervical cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The Lancet. Oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Incidence and mortality from cervical cancer and other malignancies after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, cold cone or thermocoagulation compared to LEEP as a therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review.Revista de saude publica · 2020Pooled it
- Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Pooled it
- Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2014Pooled it
- Trial
- Hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective observational multi-institutional study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022Observational
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Low recurrence rate of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful excision and routine colposcopy during follow-up.Medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24423750What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.