Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24423369›Full record

Trial reportStem cell research & therapy2013

Difference in mobilization of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction in smoking versus non-smoking patients: insights from the BONAMI trial.

Guillaume Lamirault, Sophie Susen, Virginie Forest, Caroline Hemont, Angelo Parini, Philippe Le Corvoisier, Christophe Piot, Marie-Jeanne Richard, Béatrice Delasalle, Hélène Rouard and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stem cell research & therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cell Therapies in Cardiomyopathy: Current Status of Clinical Trials.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Guillaume Lamirault
Sophie Susen
Virginie Forest
Caroline Hemont
Angelo Parini
Philippe Le Corvoisier
Christophe Piot
Marie-Jeanne Richard
Béatrice Delasalle
Hélène Rouard
Catherine Sportouch
Virginie Persoons
Eric Van Belle
Jérôme Roncalli
Patricia Lemarchand
Inserm · FRCentre d'Investigation Clinique de Nantes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor · FRInstitut d’Hématologie et d’Oncologie Pédiatrique · FRInstitut du Thorax · FRUniversité Lille Nord de France · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough autologous bone marrow cell (BMC) therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), trials reported mixed results. In the BONAMI trial, active smoking reduced cardiac function recovery after reperfused AMI. Therefore, we hypothesized that variability in the functionality of BMCs retrieved from patients with cardiovascular risk factors may partly explain these mixed results. We investigated the characteristics of progenitor cells in active smokers and non-smokers with AMI and their potential impact on BMC therapy efficacy.

methodsBone marrow and blood samples from 54 smoking and 47 non-smoking patients enrolled in the BONAMI cell therapy trial were analyzed.

resultsThe white BMC and CD45dimCD34+ cell numbers were higher in active smokers (P = 0.001, P = 0.03, respectively). In marked contrast, either bone marrow or blood endothelial progenitor CD45dimCD34 + KDR + cells (EPCs) were decreased in active smokers (P = 0.005, P = 0.04, respectively). Importantly, a multivariate analysis including cardiovascular risk factors confirmed the association between active smoking and lower EPC number in bone marrow (P = 0.04) and blood (P = 0.04). Furthermore, baseline circulating EPC count predicted infarct size decrease at three months post-AMI in non-smokers (P = 0.01) but not in active smokers. Interestingly, baseline circulating EPCs were no longer predictive of cardiac function improvement in the BMC therapy group.

conclusionsThese data suggest that circulating EPCs play an important role in cardiac repair post-AMI only in non-smokers and that active smoking-associated EPC alterations may participate in the impairment of cardiac function recovery observed in smokers after AMI, an effect that was overridden by BMC therapy.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationSmokingAdolescentAdultAgedAntigens, CD34Bone Marrow CellsBone Marrow TransplantationFemaleHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansLeukocyte Common AntigensMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionVentricular RemodelingAntigens, CD34Leukocyte Common Antigens

Identifiers

PMID24423369
PMCPMC4054959
OpenAlexW2142476376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.