Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24422881›Full record

ArticleBiology of sex differences2014

Sex-biased chromatin and regulatory cross-talk between sex chromosomes, autosomes, and mitochondria.

Katherine Silkaitis, Bernardo Lemos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sex differences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Redesigning medicine: integrating sex and gender for better health outcomes.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. A Cross-Species Neuroimaging Study of Sex Chromosome Dosage Effects on Human and Mouse Brain Anatomy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Spinal muscular atrophy: Broad disease spectrum and sex-specific phenotypes.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The Role of Genetic Sex and Mitochondria in Response to COVID-19 Infection.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rethinking sex determination of non-gonadal tissues.Current topics in developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  18. Sex differences and the neurobiology of affective disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. A father effect explains sex-ratio bias.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine Silkaitis
Bernardo LemosProgram in Molecular and Integrative Physiological Sciences, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115-6021, USA. blemos@hsph.harvard.edu.
Boston University · US

Funding

Training Program in Molecular and Integrative Physiological SciencesT32HL007118 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI LU, QUAN · 1985 to 2025
$14.3M
Temple University Minority Access to Research Careers (MARC) programT34GM087239 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI TANAKA, JACQUELINE C · 2009 to 2018
$5.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007118NIGMS NIH HHS T34 GM087239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several autoimmune and neurological diseases exhibit a sex bias, but discerning the causes and mechanisms of these biases has been challenging. Sex differences begin to manifest themselves in early embryonic development, and gonadal differentiation further bifurcates the male and female phenotypes. Even at this early stage, however, there is evidence that males and females respond to environmental stimuli differently, and the divergent phenotypic responses may have consequences later in life. The effect of prenatal nutrient restriction illustrates this point, as adult women exposed to prenatal restrictions exhibited increased risk factors of cardiovascular disease, while men exposed to the same condition did not. Recent research has examined the roles of sex-specific genes, hormones, chromosomes, and the interactions among them in mediating sex-biased phenotypes. Such research has identified testosterone, for example, as a possible protective agent against autoimmune disorders and an XX chromosome complement as a susceptibility factor in murine models of lupus and multiple sclerosis. Sex-biased chromatin is an additional and likely important component. Research suggesting a role for X and Y chromosome heterochromatin in regulating epigenetic states of autosomes has highlighted unorthodox mechanisms of gene regulation. The crosstalk between the Y chromosomes and autosomes may be further mediated by the mitochondria. The organelles have solely maternal transmission and exert differential effects on males and females. Altogether, research supports the notion that the interaction between sex-biased elements might exert novel regulatory functions in the genome and contribute to sex-specific susceptibilities to autoimmune and neurological diseases.

Identifiers

PMID24422881
PMCPMC3907150
OpenAlexW2129665448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.