Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24422191›Full record

ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2014

Rates of fecal transmission of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae among patients in intensive care units in Korea.

Jayoung Kim, Ji Young Lee, Sang Il Kim, Wonkeun Song, Jae-Seok Kim, Seungwon Jung, Jin Kyung Yu, Kang Gyun Park, Yeon-Joon Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Carriage of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: duration and risk factors.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Source Identification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Positivity of Carbapenemase-producingJournal of Korean medical science · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jayoung KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.
Ji Young LeeDepartment of Infection Control, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Sang Il KimDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Wonkeun SongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jae-Seok KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seungwon JungDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin Kyung YuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Kang Gyun ParkDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Yeon-Joon ParkDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated the rates of fecal transmission of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) among patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs).

methodsFrom June to August 2012, rectal cultures were acquired from all patients at ICU admission. For patients not carrying ESBL-E or CRE at admission, follow-up cultures were performed to detect acquisition. A chromogenic assay was used to screen for ESBL-E and CRE. Bacterial species identification and antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed using the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux, France). ESBL genotypes were determined by PCR, and clonal relatedness of the isolates was assessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

resultsOut of 347 ICU admissions, 98 patients were found to be carriers of ESBL-E (28.2%, 98/347). Follow-up cultures were acquired from 91 of the patients who tested negative for ESBL-E at admission; the acquisition rate in this group was 12.1% (11/91), although none was a nosocomial transmission. For CRE, the prevalence of fecal carriage was 0.3% (1/347), and the acquisition rate was 2.9% (4/140). None of the CRE isolates were carbapenemase-producers.

conclusionsThe high prevalence of ESBL-E carriage on admission (28.2%), coupled with rare nosocomial transmission and the very low carriage rate of CRE (0.3%), challenge the routine use of active surveillance in non-epidemic settings. Nevertheless, passive surveillance measures, such as rapid and accurate screening of clinical specimens, will be critical for controlling the spread of CRE.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCarrier StateCross InfectionDNA, BacterialDrug Resistance, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsFecesGenotypeHumansIntensive Care UnitsPolymerase Chain ReactionAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsDNA, BacterialColonizationCRECTX-MESBL-ERectal swabTransmission

Identifiers

PMID24422191
PMCPMC3885768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.