ReviewSafety and health at work2013
Oxidative DNA damage from nanoparticle exposure and its application to workers' health: a literature review.
Review in Safety and health at work, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Oxidative stress induced by occupational exposure to nanomaterials: a systematic review.Industrial health · 2020Pooled it
- Chronic PET-Microplastic Exposure: Disruption of Gut-Liver Homeostasis and Risk of Hepatic Steatosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Subcellular Mechanisms of Se(IV) Reduction in Stenotrophomonas bentonitica: Linking Environmental Detoxification and Antimicrobial Activity of Se Nanostructures Within a Circular Economy Framework.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Nanotoxicity of Porous Silica Nanoparticles: Physicochemical Properties and Mechanistic Cellular Endpoints.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Anticancer efficacy of albumin nanoparticles co-loaded with silver nanoparticles and 5FU in animal model of colon cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Forest Tree and Woody Plant-Based Biosynthesis of Nanoparticles and Their Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Scoping review on the genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in endodontics: therapeutic saviors or genetic saboteurs?Odontology · 2025Article
- Quercetin diminishes the apoptotic pathway of magnetite nanoparticles in rats' ovary: Antioxidant status and hormonal profiles.Environmental analysis, health and toxicology · 2024Article
- Exploring In Vivo Pulmonary and Splenic Toxicity Profiles of Silicon Quantum Dots in Mice.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- In Vivo Assessment of Hepatic and Kidney Toxicity Induced by Silicon Quantum Dots in Mice.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Nanoparticles: a promising tool against environmental stress in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Tissue Distribution, Pharmacokinetics, and Effect of Hematological and Biochemical Parameters of Acute Intravenous Administration of Silver Nanoparticles in Rats.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Nanoparticles-induced potential toxicity on human health: Applications, toxicity mechanisms, and evaluation models.MedComm · 2023Review
- Nanosilver: An Old Antibacterial Agent with Great Promise in the Fight against Antibiotic Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Prospect of nanomaterials as antimicrobial and antiviral regimen.AIMS microbiology · 2023Review
- Tissue Distribution, Histopathological and Genotoxic Effects of Magnetite Nanoparticles on Ehrlich Solid Carcinoma.Biological trace element research · 2022Article
- Lung Models to Evaluate Silver Nanoparticles' Toxicity and Their Impact on Human Health.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- Polyphenol effects on CuO-nanoparticle-mediated DNA damage, reactive oxygen species generation, and fibroblast cell death.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2022Article
- Comparison of cytotoxicity effects induced by four different types of nanoparticles in human corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of nanoparticles (NPs) in industry is increasing, bringing with it a number of adverse health effects on workers. Like other chemical carcinogens, NPs can cause cancer via oxidative DNA damage. Of all the molecules vulnerable to oxidative modification by NPs, DNA has received the greatest attention, and biomarkers of exposure and effect are nearing validation. This review concentrates on studies published between 2000 and 2012 that attempted to detect oxidative DNA damage in humans, laboratory animals, and cell lines. It is important to review these studies to improve the current understanding of the oxidative DNA damage caused by NP exposure in the workplace. In addition to examining studies on oxidative damage, this review briefly describes NPs, giving some examples of their adverse effects, and reviews occupational exposure assessments and approaches to minimizing exposure (e.g., personal protective equipment and engineering controls such as fume hoods). Current recommendations to minimize exposure are largely based on common sense, analogy to ultrafine material toxicity, and general health and safety recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.