Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24422081›Full record

ArticleBoneKEy reports2013

The enigmas of bone without osteocytes.

Ron Shahar, Mason N Dean

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BoneKEy reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The osteocyte and its osteoclastogenic potential.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Krogh's principle for musculoskeletal physiology and pathology.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ron ShaharKoret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem , Israel.
Mason N DeanDepartment of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces , Potsdam, Germany.
Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the hallmarks of tetrapod bone is the presence of numerous cells (osteocytes) within the matrix. Osteocytes are vital components of tetrapod bone, orchestrating the processes of bone building, reshaping and repairing (modeling and remodeling), and probably also participating in calcium-phosphorus homeostasis via both the local process of osteocytic osteolysis, and systemic effect on the kidneys. Given these critical roles of osteocytes, it is thought-provoking that the entire skeleton of many fishes consists of bone material that does not contain osteocytes. This raises the intriguing question of how the skeleton of these animals accomplishes the various essential functions attributed to osteocytes in other vertebrates, and raises the possibility that in acellular bone some of these functions are either accomplished by non-osteocytic routes or not necessary at all. In this review, we outline evidence for and against the fact that primary functions normally ascribed to osteocytes, such as mechanosensation, regulation of osteoblast/clast activity and mineral metabolism, also occur in fish bone devoid of these cells, and therefore must be carried out through alternative and perhaps ancient pathways. To enable meaningful comparisons with mammalian bone, we suggest thorough, phylogenetic examinations of regulatory pathways, studies of structure and mechanical properties and surveys of the presence/absence of bone cells in fishes. Insights gained into the micro-/nanolevel structure and architecture of fish bone, its mechanical properties and its physiology in health and disease will contribute to the discipline of fish skeletal biology, but may also help answer questions of basic bone biology.

Identifiers

PMID24422081
PMCPMC3692265
OpenAlexW2080342094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.