Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24422003›Full record

ReviewJournal of oral & maxillofacial research2012

Head and neck cancer pain: systematic review of prevalence and associated factors.

Tatiana V Macfarlane, Tanja Wirth, Sriyani Ranasinghe, Kim W Ah-See, Nick Renny, David Hurman

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of oral & maxillofacial research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Sex influences on tumor innervation.Biology of sex differences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A pilot study to improve pain phenotyping in head and neck cancer patients.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Advances in Head and Neck Cancer Pain.Journal of dental research · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatiana V MacfarlaneSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen United Kingdom.
Tanja WirthSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen United Kingdom. ; University of Bremen, Bremen Germany.
Sriyani RanasingheSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen United Kingdom. ; Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo Sri Lanka.
Kim W Ah-SeeDepartment of Otolaryngology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen United Kingdom.
Nick RennyDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen United Kingdom.
David HurmanDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen United Kingdom.
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPain is a major symptom in patients with cancer; however information on head and neck cancer related pain is limited. The aim of this review was to investigate the prevalence of pain and associated factors among patients with HNC. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe systematic review used search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases to December 2011. Cancers of the oral mucosa, oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx were included in this review with pain as main outcome. The review was restricted to full research reports of observational studies published in English. A checklist was used to assess the quality of selected studies.

resultsThere were 82 studies included in the review and most of them (84%) were conducted in the past ten years. Studies were relatively small, with a median of 80 patients (IQR 44, 154). The quality of reporting was variable. Most studies (77%) used self-administered quality of life questionnaires, where pain was a component of the overall scale. Only 33 studies reported pain prevalence in HNC patients (combined estimate from meta-analysis before (57%, 95% CI 43% - 70%) and after (42%, 95% CI 33% - 50%) treatment. Only 49 studies (60%) considered associated factors, mostly tumour- or treatment-related.

conclusionsThe study has shown high levels of pain prevalence and some factors associated with higher levels of pain. There is a need for higher quality studies in a priority area for the care of patients with head and neck cancer.

Indexed as

cancerepidemiologyhead and neck cancerpainprevalencereview.

Identifiers

PMID24422003
PMCPMC3886092
OpenAlexW2021732460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.