Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24421909›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

Standardising visual control devices for tsetse flies: Central and West African species Glossina palpalis palpalis.

Dramane Kaba, Tusevo Zacarie, Alexis Makumyaviri M'pondi, Flobert Njiokou, Henriette Bosson-Vanga, Thomas Kröber, Andrew McMullin, Steve Mihok, Patrick M Guerin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Vector research addressing country control needs.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Dramane KabaInstitut Pierre Richet/Institut National de Santé Publique, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Tusevo ZacarieDept. of Pathology, Instituto Investigação Veterinaria, Huambo, Angola.
Alexis Makumyaviri M'pondiSchool of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Flobert NjiokouUniversity of Yaoundé I, Faculty of Sciences, Laboratory of Parasitology and Ecology, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Henriette Bosson-VangaInstitut Pierre Richet/Institut National de Santé Publique, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Thomas KröberInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Andrew McMullinInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Steve MihokIndependent Scientist, Russell, Ontario, Canada.
Patrick M GuerinInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
University of Neuchâtel · CHInstitut National de Santé Publique · CIUniversité de Yaoundé I · CMUniversity of Lubumbashi · CD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlossina palpalis palpalis (G. p. palpalis) is one of the principal vectors of sleeping sickness and nagana in Africa with a geographical range stretching from Liberia in West Africa to Angola in Central Africa. It inhabits tropical rain forest but has also adapted to urban settlements. We set out to standardize a long-lasting, practical and cost-effective visually attractive device that would induce the strongest landing response by G. p. palpalis for future use as an insecticide-impregnated tool in area-wide population suppression of this fly across its range. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTrials were conducted in wet and dry seasons in the Ivory Coast, Cameroon, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Angola to measure the performance of traps (biconical, monoconical and pyramidal) and targets of different sizes and colours, with and without chemical baits, at different population densities and under different environmental conditions. Adhesive film was used as a practical enumerator at these remote locations to compare landing efficiencies of devices. Independent of season and country, both phthalogen blue-black and blue-black-blue 1 m(2) targets covered with adhesive film proved to be as good as traps in phthalogen blue or turquoise blue for capturing G. p. palpalis. Trap efficiency varied (8-51%). There was no difference between the performance of blue-black and blue-black-blue 1 m(2) targets. Baiting with chemicals augmented the overall performance of targets relative to traps. Landings on smaller phthalogen blue-black 0.25 m(2) square targets were not significantly different from either 1 m(2) blue-black-blue or blue-black square targets. Three times more flies were captured per unit area on the smaller device. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Blue-black 0.25 m(2) cloth targets show promise as simple cost effective devices for management of G. p. palpalis as they can be used for both control when impregnated with insecticide and for population sampling when covered with adhesive film.

Indexed as

PheromonesAfricaAnimalsBehavior, AnimalEntomologyMaleTsetse Fliesinsect attractantsPheromones

Identifiers

PMID24421909
PMCPMC3888452
OpenAlexW2009374019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.