Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24421898›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Hybrid speciation in a marine mammal: the clymene dolphin (Stenella clymene).

Ana R Amaral, Gretchen Lovewell, Maria M Coelho, George Amato, Howard C Rosenbaum

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana R AmaralCentro de Biologia Ambiental, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal ; Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, United States of America.
Gretchen LovewellMote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida, United States of America.
Maria M CoelhoCentro de Biologia Ambiental, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
George AmatoSackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, United States of America.
Howard C RosenbaumSackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, United States of America ; Ocean Giants Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, United States of America.
American Museum of Natural History · USMote Marine Laboratory · USUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural hybridization may result in the exchange of genetic material between divergent lineages and even the formation of new taxa. Many of the Neo-Darwinian architects argued that, particularly for animal clades, natural hybridization was maladaptive. Recent evidence, however, has falsified this hypothesis, instead indicating that this process may lead to increased biodiversity through the formation of new species. Although such cases of hybrid speciation have been described in plants, fish and insects, they are considered exceptionally rare in mammals. Here we present evidence for a marine mammal, Stenella clymene, arising through natural hybridization. We found phylogenetic discordance between mitochondrial and nuclear markers, which, coupled with a pattern of transgressive segregation seen in the morphometric variation of some characters, support a case of hybrid speciation. S. clymene is currently genetically differentiated from its putative parental species, Stenella coerueloalba and Stenella longisrostris, although low levels of introgressive hybridization may be occurring. Although non-reticulate forms of evolution, such as incomplete lineage sorting, could explain our genetic results, we consider that the genetic and morphological evidence taken together argue more convincingly towards a case of hybrid speciation. We anticipate that our study will bring attention to this important aspect of reticulate evolution in non-model mammal species. The study of speciation through hybridization is an excellent opportunity to understand the mechanisms leading to speciation in the context of gene flow.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationHybridization, GeneticAnimalsAquatic OrganismsBayes TheoremCell NucleusCytochromes bDNA, MitochondrialDolphinsFloridaGenetic LociGenetic VariationHaplotypesPhylogenySkullSpecies SpecificityCytochromes bDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID24421898
PMCPMC3885441
OpenAlexW2013764746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.