Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24421826›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale2013

Emergency department surveillance as a proxy for the prediction of circulating respiratory viral disease in Eastern Ontario.

Geoffrey Hall, Thomas Krahn, Adam Van Dijk, Gerald Evans, Kieran Moore, Allison Maier, Anna Majury

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Surveillance for emerging respiratory viruses.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Geoffrey HallDepartment of Medicine, Queen's University.
Thomas KrahnDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University.
Adam Van Dijk
Gerald EvansDepartment of Medicine, Queen's University.
Kieran MooreKingston, Frontenac, Lennox and Addington Public Health, Kingston, Ontario.
Allison MaierKingston, Frontenac, Lennox and Addington Public Health, Kingston, Ontario.
Anna Majury

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeasonal outbreaks of winter respiratory viruses are responsible for increases in morbidity and mortality in the community. Previous studies have used hospitalizations, intensive care unit and emergency department (ED) visits as indicators of seasonal influenza incidence.

objectivesTo evaluate whether ED visits can be used as a proxy to detect respiratory viral disease outbreaks, as measured by laboratory confirmation.

methodsAn Emergency Department Syndromic Surveillance system was used to collect ED chief complaints in Eastern Ontario from 2006 to 2010. Comparable laboratory-confirmed cases of respiratory viral infections were collected from the Public Health Ontario Laboratory in Kingston, Ontario. Correlations between ED visits and laboratory-confirmed cases were calculated.

resultsLaboratory-confirmed cases of selected respiratory viruses were significantly correlated with ED visits for respiratory and fever/influenza-like illness. In particular, respiratory syncytial virus (Spearman's rho = 0.593), rhinovirus (Spearman's rho = 0.280), influenza A (Spearman's rho = 0.528), influenza B (Spearman's rho = 0.426) and pH1N1 (Spearman's rho = 0.470) increased laboratory test levels were correlated with increased volume of ED visits across a number of age demographics. For the entire study population and all studied viruses, the Spearman's rho was 0.702, suggesting a strong correlation with ED visits. Laboratory-confirmed cases lagged in reporting by between one and two weeks for influenza A and pH1N1 compared with ED visit volume.

conclusionThese findings support the use of an Emergency Department Syndromic Surveillance system to track the incidence of respiratory viral disease in the community. These methods are efficient and can be performed using automated electronic data entry versus the inherent delays in the primary care sentinel surveillance system, and can aid the timely implementation of preventive and preparatory health interventions.

Indexed as

Emergency department surveillanceRespiratorySyndromic surveillanceViral disease

Identifiers

PMID24421826
PMCPMC3852452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.