Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24421795›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale2013

Antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use associated with laboratory-confirmed cases of Campylobacter infection in two health units in Ontario.

Anne E Deckert, Richard J Reid-Smith, Susan E Tamblyn, Larry Morrell, Patrick Seliske, Frances B Jamieson, Rebecca Irwin, Catherine E Dewey, Patrick Boerlin, Scott A McEwen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Decade of Antimicrobial Resistance in Human and AnimalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antimicrobial Resistance ofFoodborne pathogens and disease · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Ciprofloxacin-resistantCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Anne E DeckertDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph; ; Laboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph;
Richard J Reid-SmithDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph; ; Laboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph;
Susan E TamblynPublic Health Consultant, Stratford;
Larry MorrellPerth District Health Unit, Stratford;
Patrick SeliskeWellington-Dufferin-Guelph District Health Unit, Guelph;
Frances B JamiesonPublic Health Ontario, Toronto;
Rebecca IrwinLaboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph;
Catherine E DeweyDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph;
Patrick BoerlinDepartment of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario.
Scott A McEwenDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph;
Public Health Agency of Canada · CAUniversity of Guelph · CAGuelph Wellington Seniors Association · CAPublic Health Ontario · CAStratford Hospital · GBStratford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimA population-based study was conducted over a two-year period in the Perth District (PD) and Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph (WDG) health units in Ontario to document antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use associated with clinical cases of laboratory-confirmed campylobacteriosis.

methodsEtest (bioMérieux SA, France) was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin (CIP), clindamycin, erythromycin (ERY), gentamicin, nalidixic acid and tetracycline. Data regarding antimicrobial use were collected from 250 cases.

resultsOf the 250 cases, 165 (65.7%) reported staying home or being hospitalized due to campylobacteriosis. Fifty-four per cent of cases (135 of 249) reported taking antimicrobials to treat campylobacteriosis. In 115 cases (51.1%), fecal culture results were not used for treatment decisions because they were not available before the initiation of antimicrobial treatment and/or they were not available before the cessation of symptoms. Of the 250 cases, 124 (49.6%) had available Campylobacter isolates, of which 66 (53.2%) were resistant to at least one of the antimicrobials tested. No resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol or gentamicin was found in these isolates. Six isolates (4.8%) were resistant to CIP. Two isolates (1.6%) were resistant to ERY; however, no isolates were resistant to both CIP and ERY.

conclusionPrudent use practices should be promoted among physicians to reduce the use of antimicrobials for the treatment of gastroenteritis in general and campylobacteriosis in particular, as well as to minimize the future development of resistance to these antimicrobials in Campylobacter species.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceAntimicrobial useCampylobacterCanadaOntario

Identifiers

PMID24421795
PMCPMC3630032
OpenAlexW62105441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.