Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24421608›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2013

The relative effectiveness of segment specific level and non-specific level spinal joint mobilization on pain and range of motion: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Emily Joan Slaven, Adam P Goode, Rogelio A Coronado, Charles Poole, Eric J Hegedus

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04054869 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Bio-mechanical Reasoning and Lateral Specificity of Upper Cervical Joint Mobilization to Improve Cervical Rotation, Improve Function and Reduce Pain.... Does it Matter?

TypeinterventionalSponsorAndrews UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled15ConditionsNeck PainArmsBio-mechanically correct manual therapy at the cervical atlanto-axial joints, Bio-mechanically in-correct manual therapy at the cervical atlanto-axial joints
NCT04158115 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Between Segmental Mobilization And Entire Spine Mobilization In Lumbar Spondylosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled40ConditionsSpondylosis LumbarArmsEntire Spine Mobilization, Segmental Mobilization
NCT04788160 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Cervical SNAG Half Rotation Technique in Cervicogenic Headache Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled66ConditionsCervicogenic HeadacheArmsCervical SNAGs along with conventional therapy, Conventional Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. A Clinically-Reasoned Approach to Manual Therapy in Sports Physical Therapy.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Time to evolve: the applicability of pain phenotyping in manual therapy.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily Joan SlavenUniversity of Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Adam P GoodeUniversity of Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Rogelio A CoronadoUniversity of Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Charles PooleUniversity of Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Eric J HegedusUniversity of Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designSystematic literature review and meta-analysis.

objectiveIN SYMPTOMATIC SUBJECTS TO: (1) examine the effects of a single session of joint mobilization on pain at rest and with most painful movement, and (2) compare the effects when joint mobilization is provided to a specific or non-specific spinal level.

backgroundJoint mobilization is routinely used for treating spinal pain in conjunction with other interventions, but its unique effect is not well understood. Further, there is controversy about the role of 'specific level' techniques in producing benefit.

methodsSearches were performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PEDro) from 1966 through November 2010. Methodological quality was assessed using previously detailed criteria. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted on eligible studies.

resultsEight RCTs with a mean methodological score of 10/12 were included. Significant heterogeneity (P = 0.075) was found in the overall meta-analysis estimate. When stratified by body location, no significant individual effect was found for pain at rest. However, there was a statistical mean difference [0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.13-1.28)] between pain at rest for the cervical and lumbar individual means.

conclusionsWe found multiple studies which provided evidence that a single session of joint mobilization can lead to a reduction of pain at rest and with most painful movement. When using joint mobilization, the need for specific versus non-specific level mobilization may be influenced by anatomical region; the direction of effect in the cervical spine was toward specific mobilization and in the lumbar spine towards non-specific mobilization.

Indexed as

PainSpecific levelSpinal mobilization

Identifiers

PMID24421608
PMCPMC3578190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.