Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24421318›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2014

Patient acceptable symptom states after totalhip or knee replacement at mid-term follow-up: Thresholds of the Oxford hip and knee scores.

J C Keurentjes, F R Van Tol, M Fiocco, C So-Osman, R Onstenk, A W M M Koopman-Van Gemert, R G Pöll, R G H H Nelissen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Virtual arthroplasty follow-up (VARF) in total hip replacement: a safe, effective, and sustainable model for post-operative care.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. A radiological index that influences the outcome following patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: the anterior trochlea offset ratio.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): thresholds for the EQ-5D-5L and Oxford hip and knee scores for patients with total hip and knee replacement.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J C KeurentjesLeiden University Medical Center, Departmentof Orthopaedic Surgery/Department of Medical Statistics, Albinusdreef2, Room J-09-127, PO Box9600, Postzone J-11-S, 2300RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
F R Van Tol
M Fiocco
C So-Osman
R Onstenk
A W M M Koopman-Van Gemert
R G Pöll
R G H H Nelissen
European Society of Anaesthesiology · BEInstitute for Transfusion Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo define Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for the Oxford hip score (OHS) and Oxford knee score (OKS) at mid-term follow-up.

methodsIn a prospective multicentre cohort study, OHS and OKS were collected at a mean follow-up of three years (1.5 to 6.0), combined with a numeric rating scale (NRS) for satisfaction and an external validation question assessing the patient's willingness to undergo surgery again. A total of 550 patients underwent total hip replacement (THR) and 367 underwent total knee replacement (TKR).

resultsReceiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves identified a PASS threshold of 42 for the OHS after THR and 37 for the OKS after TKR. THR patients with an OHS ≥ 42 and TKR patients with an OKS ≥ 37 had a higher NRS for satisfaction and a greater likelihood of being willing to undergo surgery again.

conclusionsPASS thresholds appear larger at mid-term follow-up than at six months after surgery. With- out external validation, we would advise against using these PASS thresholds as absolute thresholds in defining whether or not a patient has attained an acceptable symptom state after THR or TKR. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:7-13.

Indexed as

Health-related quality of lifePatient Acceptable Symptom StatePatient reported outcome measuresPROMsTHRTKRTotal hip replacementTotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID24421318
PMCPMC3928564
OpenAlexW1986075933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.