Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24421290›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Data use and effectiveness in electronic surveillance of healthcare associated infections in the 21st century: a systematic review.

Jeroen S de Bruin, Walter Seeling, Christian Schuh

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Electronically assisted surveillance systems of healthcare-associated infections: a systematic review.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Registries supporting new drug applications.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeroen S de BruinSection for Medical Expert and Knowledge-Based Systems, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Walter SeelingSection for Medical Expert and Knowledge-Based Systems, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christian SchuhSection for Medical Expert and Knowledge-Based Systems, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAs more electronic health records have become available during the last decade, we aimed to uncover recent trends in use of electronically available patient data by electronic surveillance systems for healthcare associated infections (HAIs) and identify consequences for system effectiveness.

methodsA systematic review of published literature evaluating electronic HAI surveillance systems was performed. The PubMed service was used to retrieve publications between January 2001 and December 2011. Studies were included in the review if they accurately described what electronic data were used and if system effectiveness was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value. Trends were identified by analyzing changes in the number and types of electronic data sources used.

results26 publications comprising discussions on 27 electronic systems met the eligibility criteria. Trend analysis showed that systems use an increasing number of data sources which are either medico-administrative or clinical and laboratory-based data. Trends on the use of individual types of electronic data confirmed the paramount role of microbiology data in HAI detection, but also showed increased use of biochemistry and pharmacy data, and the limited adoption of clinical data and physician narratives. System effectiveness assessments indicate that the use of heterogeneous data sources results in higher system sensitivity at the expense of specificity.

conclusionsDriven by the increased availability of electronic patient data, electronic HAI surveillance systems use more data, making systems more sensitive yet less specific, but also allow systems to be tailored to the needs of healthcare institutes' surveillance programs.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHealth Information SystemsCross InfectionHumansPopulation SurveillanceAutomatic Data ProcessingCross Infection/methodsExpert SystemsInfection ControlReview Literature as Topic

Identifiers

PMID24421290
PMCPMC4147601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.