Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24421265›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2014

Measurement of rat brain tumor kinetics using an intravascular MR contrast agent and DCE-MRI nested model selection.

Wilson B Chwang, Rajan Jain, Hassan Bagher-Ebadian, Siamak P Nejad-Davarani, A S M Iskander, Ashley VanSlooten, Lonni Schultz, Ali S Arbab, James R Ewing

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Are complex DCE-MRI models supported by clinical data?Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wilson B ChwangDepartment of Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Rajan Jain
Hassan Bagher-Ebadian
Siamak P Nejad-Davarani
A S M Iskander
Ashley VanSlooten
Lonni Schultz
Ali S Arbab
James R Ewing
Henry Ford Hospital · USOakland University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Understanding Mechanisms of Resistance to Anti-angiogenic TreatmentsR01CA160216 · NCI · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ARBAB, ALI SYED · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
MRI Biomarkers of Response in Cerebral TumorsR01CA135329 · NCI · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI EWING, JAMES R · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
Cellular MRI in Glioma and Radiation NecrosisR01CA122031 · NCI · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ARBAB, ALI SYED · 2007 to 2010
$992k
In vivo detection of involvement of endogenous BM progenitor cells in gliomaR01CA172048 · NCI · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ARBAB, ALI SYED · 2012 to 2014
$894k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA122031NCI NIH HHS R01 CA135329NCI NIH HHS R01 CA135329-01NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160216NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUsing dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in a rat glioma model, and nested model selection (NMS), to compare estimates of the pharmacokinetic parameters vp , K(trans) , and ve for two different contrast agents (CAs)-gadofosveset, which reversibly binds to human serum albumin, and gadopentetate dimeglumine, which does not. MATERIALS AND

methodsDCE-MRI studies were performed on nine Fisher 344 rats inoculated intracerebrally with 9L gliosarcoma cells using both gadofosveset and gadopentetate. The parameters vp , K(trans) , and ve were estimated using NMS.

resultsK(trans) estimates using gadofosveset, compared to gadopentetate, differed in their means (gadofosveset 0.025 ± 0.008 min(-1) vs. gadopentetate 0.046 ± 0.011 min(-1) ; P = 0.0039). This difference notwithstanding, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the two estimates of K(trans) showed nearly perfect linear dependence (ICC = 0.8479 by Pearson's r). Other estimates, ve (gadofosveset 22.7 ± 4.7% vs. gadopentetate 23.6 ± 5.6%; P = 0.4258) and vp (gadofosveset 1.5 ± 0.5% vs. gadopentetate 1.6 ± 0.4%; P = 0.25), were not different in their means between the two CAs, and there was almost perfect agreement for ve (ICC = 0.8798) and substantial agreement for vp (ICC = 0.7981) between the two CAs.

conclusionEstimates of K(trans) were statistically different using gadofosveset and gadopentetate, whereas ve and vp were similar with two CAs. NMS produced robust estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters using DCE-MRI that show promise as important measures of tumor physiology and microenvironment.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain NeoplasmsContrast MediaFemaleGadoliniumGadolinium DTPAGliosarcomaImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm TransplantationOrganometallic CompoundsRatsRats, Inbred F344Statistics as TopicContrast Mediagadofosveset trisodiumGadoliniumGadolinium DTPAOrganometallic Compoundscontrast agentDCE-MRIgadofosvesetgadopentetate

Identifiers

PMID24421265
PMCPMC4686270
OpenAlexW1818492948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.