Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24420312›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2014

Anti-epileptogenic clinical trial designs in epilepsy: issues and options.

Dieter Schmidt, Daniel Friedman, Marc A Dichter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Prevention of Epilepsy: Issues and Innovations.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016
    Review
  14. Review
  15. The potential of antiseizure drugs and agents that act on novel molecular targets as antiepileptogenic treatments.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2014
    Review
  16. Novel concepts in epileptogenesis and its prevention.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dieter SchmidtEpilepsy Research Group, Goethestrasse 5, 14163, Berlin, Germany, dbschmidt@t-online.de.
Daniel Friedman
Marc A Dichter

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000038 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CRONSTEIN, BRUCE NEIL · 2012 to 2014
$16.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although trials with anti-seizure drugs have not shown anti-epileptogenic or disease-modifying activity in humans, new compounds are on the horizon that may require novel trial designs. We briefly discuss the unique challenges and the available options to identify innovative clinical trial designs that differentiate novel anti-epileptogenic and disease-modifying compounds, preferably early in phase II, from current anti-seizure drugs. The most important challenges of clinical testing of agents for epilepsy prevention include having sufficient preclinical evidence for a suitable agent to proceed with a human trial of an anti-epileptogenic drug, and to demonstrate the feasibility of doing such a trial. Major challenges in trial design to assess agents for disease modification include the choice of suitable study parameters, the identification of a high-risk study population, the type of control, the time and duration of treatment, and a feasible follow-up period.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicAnimalsAnticonvulsantsDrug DiscoveryEpilepsyHumansAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

PMID24420312
PMCPMC3996121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.