Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24419566›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2014

Risk of chronic kidney disease after cancer nephrectomy.

Lin Li, Wei Ling Lau, Connie M Rhee, Kevin Harley, Csaba P Kovesdy, John J Sim, Steve Jacobsen, Anthony Chang, Jaime Landman, Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The evolving management of small renal masses.Nature reviews. Urology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Glomerular hyperfiltration.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Nephrotoxicity of Anti-Angiogenic Therapies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Perspectives From an Onconephrology Interest Group: Conference Report.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Mono, bi- and tri-exponential diffusion MRI modelling for renal solid masses and comparison with histopathological findings.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Renal cell carcinoma: new insights and challenges for a clinician scientist.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lin LiDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, CA 92868, USA.
Wei Ling LauDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, CA 92868, USA.
Connie M RheeDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, CA 92868, USA.
Kevin HarleyDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, CA 92868, USA.
Csaba P KovesdyDivision of Nephrology, University of Tennessee Health Science Centre, 956 Court Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
John J SimDepartment of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Southern California, 4700 Sunset Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 90027, USA.
Steve JacobsenDepartment of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA.
Anthony ChangDepartment of Pathology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Jaime LandmanDepartment of Urology, University of California, Irvine, 333 The City Drive South, Orange, CA 92868, USA.
Kamyar Kalantar-ZadehDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, CA 92868, USA.
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN ACADEMIC NEPHROLOGYT32DK007527 · NIDDK · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BONVENTRE, JOSEPH VINCENT · 1986 to 2021
$8.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of early stage renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is increasing and observational studies have shown equivalent oncological outcomes of partial versus radical nephrectomy for stage I tumours. Population studies suggest that compared with radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy is associated with decreased mortality and a lower rate of postoperative decline in kidney function. However, rates of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients who have undergone nephrectomy might be higher than in the general population. The risks of new-onset or accelerated CKD and worsened survival after nephrectomy might be linked, as kidney insufficiency is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality. Nephron-sparing approaches have, therefore, been proposed as the standard of care for patients with type 1a tumours and as a viable option for those with type 1b tumours. However, prospective data on the incidence of de novo and accelerated CKD after cancer nephrectomy is lacking, and the only randomized trial to date was closed prematurely. Intrinsic abnormalities in non-neoplastic kidney parenchyma and comorbid conditions (including diabetes mellitus and hypertension) might increase the risks of CKD and RCC. More research is needed to better understand the risk of CKD post-nephrectomy, to develop and validate predictive scores for risk-stratification, and to optimize patient management.

Indexed as

Global HealthHumansIncidenceKidney NeoplasmsNephrectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID24419566
OpenAlexW1993291335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.