Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24418993›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2014

Update on second primary malignancies in multiple myeloma: a focused review.

O Landgren, S Mailankody

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. New cancers after autotransplantations for multiple myeloma.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2015
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. [Multiple myeloma associated with myeloid tumor: 5 cases report and literatures review].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Mechanisms of Action of Lenalidomide in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

O LandgrenMultiple Myeloma Section, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
S MailankodyMultiple Myeloma Section, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last decade has seen significant advances in the management of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). With increasingly effective therapies, MM patients are living longer. With improvements in survival, long-term complications including second primary malignancies are becoming new challenges in providing optimal care for MM patients. Three randomized studies have demonstrated possible clinical benefit with maintenance lenalidomide for patients with MM. These same studies have also demonstrated an increased risk of second primary malignancies. In this review, we will update on the current information regarding mechanisms and risk of developing second primary malignancies with a particular focus on disease- and treatment-related factors.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsHumansImmunologic FactorsLenalidomideMultiple MyelomaNeoplasms, Second PrimaryRiskThalidomideAntineoplastic AgentsImmunologic FactorsLenalidomideThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID24418993
OpenAlexW2004577304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.