ArticleAnnals of botany2014
Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: new evidence and future perspectives.
Article in Annals of botany, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
112 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Most Effective Pollinators Predict Intraspecific Floral Color Diversity Across an Edaphic Matrix.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Pollinator efficiency, rather than bee decline, explains a shift to hummingbird pollination in tropical montane forests.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Introgression despite minimal hybridization: mating system modulates phenotypic associations with introgression in Clarkia.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Learning to be unfaithful - preferences and flower constancy of Eristalis tenax (Syrphidae) decrease with experience.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Patterns of Wild Bee-Plant Interactions on a Large and Mostly Unexplored Mediterranean Island (Sardinia, Italy).Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Species evolution determines epiphyte evolution in Orchids.Plant diversity · 2026Article
- Testing macroevolutionary predictions of the Grant-Stebbins model in the origin of Aeschynanthus acuminatus.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Genomic signatures of reproductive isolation are decoupled from floral divergence in a long-standing hybrid zone.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Augmenting plant-pollinator interactions to promote biodiversity and global food security.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Diversity and ecological functions of anthocyanins.BMC plant biology · 2025Review
- Floral Roles in Hummingbirds-Mediated Indirect Plant Interactions in Tropical Andean Communities.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Beyond the Grant-Stebbins model: floral adaptive landscapes and plant speciation.Annals of botany · 2025Review
- Geographical variation in flower colour of a food-deceptive orchid reflects local pollinator preferences.Annals of botany · 2025Article
- Evolution of petal patterning: blooming floral diversity at the microscale.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- Floral Integration and Phenotypic Selection on Floral Traits ofEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Evolutionary implications of a deep-time perspective on insect pollination.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Review
- The road less taken: Dihydroflavonol 4-reductase inactivation and delphinidin anthocyanin loss underpins a natural intraspecific flower colour variation.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Pollination niche shifts in sympatric globular cactiPlant diversity · 2025Article
- Pre-pollination isolation by pollinator specificity: settling moth versus hawkmoth pollination in two sympatric Habenaria species (Orchidaceae).BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Within-species floral evolution reveals convergence in adaptive walks during incipient pollinator shift.Nature communications · 2025Article
52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe hypothesis that pollinators have been important drivers of angiosperm diversity dates back to Darwin, and remains an important research topic today. Mounting evidence indicates that pollinators have the potential to drive diversification at several different stages of the evolutionary process. Microevolutionary studies have provided evidence for pollinator-mediated floral adaptation, while macroevolutionary evidence supports a general pattern of pollinator-driven diversification of angiosperms. However, the overarching issue of whether, and how, shifts in pollination system drive plant speciation represents a critical gap in knowledge. Bridging this gap is crucial to fully understand whether pollinator-driven microevolution accounts for the observed macroevolutionary patterns. Testable predictions about pollinator-driven speciation can be derived from the theory of ecological speciation, according to which adaptation (microevolution) and speciation (macroevolution) are directly linked. This theory is a particularly suitable framework for evaluating evidence for the processes underlying shifts in pollination systems and their potential consequences for the evolution of reproductive isolation and speciation. SCOPE: This Viewpoint paper focuses on evidence for the four components of ecological speciation in the context of plant-pollinator interactions, namely (1) the role of pollinators as selective agents, (2) floral trait divergence, including the evolution of 'pollination ecotypes', (3) the geographical context of selection on floral traits, and (4) the role of pollinators in the evolution of reproductive isolation. This Viewpoint also serves as the introduction to a Special Issue on Pollinator-Driven Speciation in Plants. The 13 papers in this Special Issue range from microevolutionary studies of ecotypes to macroevolutionary studies of historical ecological shifts, and span a wide range of geographical areas and plant families. These studies further illustrate innovative experimental approaches, and they employ modern tools in genetics and floral trait quantification. Future advances to the field require better quantification of selection through male fitness and pollinator isolation, for instance by exploiting next-generation sequencing technologies. By combining these new tools with strategically chosen study systems, and smart experimental design, we predict that examples of pollinator-driven speciation will be among the most widespread and compelling of all cases of ecological speciation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.