Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24418692›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2015

Communication About Advance Directives and End-of-Life Care Options Among Internal Medicine Residents.

Ramona L Rhodes, Kate Tindall, Lei Xuan, M Elizabeth Paulk, Ethan A Halm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A mixed-methods exploration of faith, spirituality, and health program interest among older African Americans with HIV.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ramona L RhodesDivision of Geriatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA ramona.rhodes@UTSouthwestern.edu.
Kate TindallDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Lei XuanDivision of Outcomes and Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
M Elizabeth PaulkDivision of General Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Ethan A HalmDivision of Outcomes and Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA Division of General Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1)UL1TR001105 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$24.5M
North and Central Texas Clinical and Translational Science Initiative (KL2)KL2RR024983 · NCRR · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2007 to 2011
$4.3M
UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1KL2TR001103 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$4.0M
UT-Southwestern Clinical and Translational Alliance for Research (UT-STAR) (TL1)KL2TR000453 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2012 to 2012
$456k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000453NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR000453.NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001103NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001105NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increasing awareness about the importance of discussing end-of-life (EOL) care options with terminally ill patients and families, many physicians remain uncomfortable with these discussions.

objectiveThe objective of the study was to examine perceptions of and comfort with EOL care discussions among a group of internal medicine residents and the extent to which comfort with these discussions has improved over time.

methodsIn 2013, internal medicine residents at a large academic medical center were asked to participate in an on-line survey that assessed their attitudes and experiences with discussing EOL care with terminally-ill patients. These results were compared to data from a similar survey residents in the same program completed in 2006.

resultsEighty-three (50%) residents completed the 2013 survey. About half (52%) felt strongly that they were able to have open, honest discussions with patients and families, while 71% felt conflicted about whether CPR was in the patient's best interest. About half (53%) felt strongly that it was okay for them to tell a patient/family member whether or not CPR was a good idea for them. Compared to 2006 respondents, the 2013 cohort felt they had more lectures about EOL communication, and had watched an attending have an EOL discussion more often.

conclusionsModest improvements were made over time in trainees' exposure to EOL discussions; however, many residents remain uncomfortable and conflicted with having EOL care discussions with their patients. More effective training approaches in EOL communication are needed to train the next generation of internists.

Indexed as

Advance DirectivesCommunicationInternship and ResidencyAdultFemaleHumansInternal MedicineMalePhysician-Patient RelationsTerminal Careadvance directiveshospiceinternal medicine residentsmedical educationpalliative carepatient–physician communication

Identifiers

PMID24418692
PMCPMC4385504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.