Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24418653›Full record

Trial reportBehaviour research and therapy2014

Moderators of two indicated cognitive-behavioral depression prevention approaches for adolescents in a school-based effectiveness trial.

Frédéric N Brière, Paul Rohde, Heather Shaw, Eric Stice

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behaviour research and therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Evaluating Effect Moderators in Cognitive Versus Behavioral Based CBT-Modules and Sequences Towards Preventing Adolescent Depression.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Identifying Moderators of Response to the Penn Resiliency Program: A Synthesis Study.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Frédéric N BrièreUniversité de Montréal, 90 Vincent d'Indy Avenue, H2V 2S9 Québec, Canada; School Environment Research Group, 7101 ave du Parc, H3N 1X7 Québec, Canada. Electronic address: frederic.nault-briere@umontreal.ca.
Paul RohdeOregon Research Institute, 1776 Millrace Dr., 97403 Oregon, USA.
Heather ShawOregon Research Institute, 1776 Millrace Dr., 97403 Oregon, USA.
Eric SticeOregon Research Institute, 1776 Millrace Dr., 97403 Oregon, USA.
Oregon Research Institute · USUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

Effectiveness Trial of an Adolescent Depression Prevention ProgramR01MH080853 · NIMH · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ROHDE, PAUL D · 2009 to 2013
$2.8M
NIMH NIH HHS MH080853NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur aim was to identify moderators of the effects of a cognitive behavioral group-based prevention program (CB group) and CB bibliotherapy, relative to an educational brochure control condition and to one another, in a school-based effectiveness randomized controlled prevention trial.

method378 adolescents (M age = 15.5, 68% female) with elevated depressive symptoms were randomized in one of three conditions and were assessed at pretest, posttest, and 6-month follow-up. We tested the moderating effect of three individual (baseline depressive symptoms, negative attributional style, substance use), three environmental (negative life events, parental support, peer support), and two sociodemographic (sex, age) characteristics.

resultsBaseline depressive symptoms interacted with condition and time. Decomposition indicated that elevated baseline depressive symptoms amplified the effect of CB bibliotherapy at posttest (but not 6-month follow-up) relative to the control condition, but did not modify the effect of CB group relative to the control condition or relative to bibliotherapy. Specifically, CB bibliotherapy resulted in lower posttest depressive symptoms than the control condition in individuals with elevated, but not average or low baseline symptoms. We found no interaction effect for other putative moderators.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that bibliotherapy is effective only in participants who have elevated depressive symptoms at baseline. The fact that no study variable moderated the effects of CB group, which had a significant main effect in reducing depressive symptoms relative to the control condition, suggests that this indicated prevention intervention is effective for a wide range of adolescents.

Indexed as

School Health ServicesAdolescentBibliotherapyCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMalePsychotherapy, GroupRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultACSQAdolescenceadolescent cognitive style questionnaireBibliotherapyCBCenter for Epidemiologic Studies-DepressionCES-Dcognitive-behavioralCognitive-behavioralDepressionICCintra-class correlationK-SADSmajor depressive disorderMDDModeratorsNetwork of Relationship InventoryNRIPreventionschedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age childrenSDstandard deviation

Identifiers

PMID24418653
PMCPMC3919661
OpenAlexW2150769559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.