Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24418478›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2014

Similar recombination-activating gene (RAG) mutations result in similar immunobiological effects but in different clinical phenotypes.

Hanna IJspeert, Gertjan J Driessen, Michael J Moorhouse, Nico G Hartwig, Beata Wolska-Kusnierz, Krzysztof Kalwak, Anna Pituch-Noworolska, Irina Kondratenko, Joris M van Montfrans, Ester Mejstrikova and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Generation of antigen-specific mature T cells from RAG1Nature biomedical engineering · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Hanna IJspeertDepartment of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gertjan J DriessenDepartment of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael J MoorhouseDepartment of Blood Cell Research, Stichting Sanquin Bloedvoorziening, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nico G HartwigDepartment of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Beata Wolska-KusnierzDepartment of Immunology, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof KalwakDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Anna Pituch-NoworolskaDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Polish-American Institute of Pediatrics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Irina KondratenkoDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Russian State Children's Hospital, Moscow, Russia.
Joris M van MontfransDepartment of Pediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Utrecht and Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ester MejstrikovaDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Medical School, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Arjan C LankesterDepartment of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anton W LangerakDepartment of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dik C van GentDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrew P StubbsDepartment of Bioinformatics, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacques J M van DongenDepartment of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mirjam van der BurgDepartment of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.vanderburg@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC · NLCharles University · CZChildren's Memorial Health Institute · PLJagiellonian University · PLLeiden University Medical Center · NLRussian Children's Clinical Hospital · RUSanquin · NLWilhelmina Children's Hospital · NLWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundV(D)J recombination takes place during lymphocyte development to generate a large repertoire of T- and B-cell receptors. Mutations in recombination-activating gene 1 (RAG1) and RAG2 result in loss or reduction of V(D)J recombination. It is known that different mutations in RAG genes vary in residual recombinase activity and give rise to a broad spectrum of clinical phenotypes.

objectiveWe sought to study the immunologic mechanisms causing the clinical spectrum of RAG deficiency.

methodsWe included 22 patients with similar RAG1 mutations (c.519delT or c.368_369delAA) resulting in N-terminal truncated RAG1 protein with residual recombination activity but presenting with different clinical phenotypes. We studied precursor B-cell development, immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor repertoire formation, receptor editing, and B- and T-cell numbers.

resultsClinically, patients were divided into 3 main categories: T(-)B(-) severe combined immunodeficiency, Omenn syndrome, and combined immunodeficiency. All patients showed a block in the precursor B-cell development, low B- and T-cell numbers, normal immunoglobulin gene use, limited B- and T-cell repertoires, and slightly impaired receptor editing.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that similar RAG mutations can result in similar immunobiological effects but different clinical phenotypes, indicating that the level of residual recombinase activity is not the only determinant for clinical outcome. We postulate a model in which the type and moment of antigenic pressure affect the clinical phenotypes of these patients.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesMutationPhenotypeB-LymphocytesChild, PreschoolComplementarity Determining RegionsGene ExpressionGenotypeHomeodomain ProteinsHumansImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsInfantInfant, NewbornLymphocyte CountSevere Combined ImmunodeficiencyT-LymphocytesComplementarity Determining RegionsHomeodomain ProteinsImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsRAG-1 proteinautoimmunityB- and T-cell receptor repertoireimmune repertoire analysisnext generation sequencingRAG deficiencyreceptor editingV(D)J recombination

Identifiers

PMID24418478
PMCPMC7112318
OpenAlexW2033926666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.