Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24417939›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2014

National survey of clinical communication assessment in medical education in the United Kingdom (UK).

Anita Laidlaw, Helen Salisbury, Eva M Doherty, Connie Wiskin, UK Council for Clinical Communication in Undergraduate Medical Education

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Physiotherapist-patient communication in entry-level physiotherapy education: A national survey in Nigeria.Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao · 2019
    Article
  9. Assessing effective communication skills in students during clinical education.Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anita LaidlawMedical School, University of St Andrews, Medical and Biological Sciences building, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9TF, Scotland. ahl1@st-andrews.ac.uk.
Helen Salisbury
Eva M Doherty
Connie Wiskin
UK Council for Clinical Communication in Undergraduate Medical Education

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAll medical schools in the UK are required to be able to provide evidence of competence in clinical communication in their graduates. This is usually provided by summative assessment of clinical communication, but there is considerable variation in how this is carried out. This study aimed to gain insight into the current assessment of clinical communication in UK medical schools.

methodsThe survey was sent via e-mail to communication leads who then were asked to consult with all staff within their medical school involved in the assessment of communication.

resultsResults were obtained from 27 out of 33 schools (response rate 82%) and a total of 34 courses. The average number of assessments per year was 2.4 (minimum 0, maximum 10). The Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) was the most commonly used method of assessment (53%). Other assessments included MCQ and workplace based assessments. Only nine courses used a single method of assessment. Issues raised included, logistics and costs of assessing mainly by OSCE, the robustness and reliability of such exams and integration with other clinical skills.

conclusionsIt is encouraging that a variety of assessment methods are being used within UK medical schools and that these methods target different components of clinical communication skills acquisition.

Indexed as

CommunicationClinical CompetenceData CollectionEducational MeasurementEducation, MedicalHumansInterprofessional RelationsPhysician-Patient RelationsSchools, MedicalUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID24417939
PMCPMC3898466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.