Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24416701›Full record

ReviewGlobal advances in health and medicine2013

Reproductive health disparities: a focus on family planning and prevention among minority women and adolescents.

Sadia Haider, Cynthia Stoffel, Geri Donenberg, Stacie Geller

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global advances in health and medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sadia HaiderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States.
Cynthia StoffelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States.
Geri DonenbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States.
Stacie GellerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States.
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

UIC Program for Interdisciplinary Careers in Women's Health ResearchK12HD055892 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI GELLER, STACIE E. · 2007 to 2016
$4.9M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minority women and adolescent females of all races and ethnicities are disproportionately affected by unintended pregnancy in the United States. Adolescents also experience an additional proportion of the burden compared to other age groups, as 82% of pregnancies among women 19 years old and younger are unintended. Moreover, minority and adolescent mothers are at increased risk for having preterm deliveries, low birth weight infants, and other complications. Unintended pregnancy continues to be an important public health problem in the United States, and prevention through family planning is urgently needed. This review presents an overview of the US demographics for unintended pregnancy among both minority and adolescent women and identifies current and past eüorts to reduce unintended pregnancy, specifically among minority and adolescent females, through contraception and family-planning programs.

Indexed as

abortioncontraceptionMinorityunintended pregnancywomen' health

Identifiers

PMID24416701
PMCPMC3833575
OpenAlexW2007367578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.