Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24416684›Full record

ReviewGlobal advances in health and medicine2013

A Systematic Review of the Literature on Health and Wellness Coaching: Defining a Key Behavioral intervention in Healthcare.

Ruth Q Wolever, Leigh Ann Simmons, Gary A Sforzo, Diana Dill, Miranda Kaye, Elizabeth M Bechard, Mary Elaine Southard, Mary Kennedy, Justine Vosloo, Nancy Yang

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global advances in health and medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 180 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05151445 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Use of a Consumer-Based mHealth Dietary App and Health Coaching With Kidney Transplant Recipients

TypeobservationalSponsorOhio State UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsKidney Transplant, Kidney Transplant, ComplicationsArmsmHealth dietary app + health coaching intervention
NCT05284162 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effects of a Theory-guided Health Coaching Programme on Health Promoting Behaviours in Middle-Aged Adults With Cardiometabolic Risk: a Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2021 to 2023Enrolled202ConditionsCoaching, Cardiovascular Diseases, Metabolic DiseasesArmsHealth coaching
NCT05336019 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of the Diabetes Self-management Coaching Program on the Clinical and Behavioral Parameters for Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes in the Ethiopian PC Setting: Mixed-methods Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen's UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsType 2 Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsDiabetes self-management Coaching, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 433 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A Systematic Review of Workplace Physical Activity Coaching.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Sustainability of Hiking in Combination with Coaching in Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Quality of Life.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ruth Q WoleverDuke Integrative Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Leigh Ann SimmonsDuke Integrative Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina and Duke School of Nursing, Durham, United States.
Gary A SforzoDepartment of Exercise and Sport Sciences, School of Health Science and Human Performance, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Diana DillWorking Together For Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Miranda KayeDepartment of Exercise and Sport Sciences, School of Health Science and Human Performance, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Elizabeth M BechardDuke Integrative Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Mary Elaine SouthardIntegrative Health Consulting and Coaching, LLC, Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States.
Mary KennedyInstitute of Lifestyle Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Justine VoslooDepartment of Exercise and Sport Sciences, School of Health Science and Human Performance, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Nancy YangDuke School of Nursing, Durham, United States.
Duke University Health System · USIthaca College · USSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital · USTogether · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PRIMARY

objectiveReview the operational definitions of health and wellness coaching as published in the peer-reviewed medical literature.

backgroundAs global rates of preventable chronic diseases have reached epidemic proportions, there has been an increased focus on strategies to improve health behaviors and associated outcomes. One such strategy, health and wellness coaching, has been inconsistently defined and shown mixed results.

methodsA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided systematic review of the medical literature on health and wellness coaching allowed for compilation of data on specific features of the coaching interventions and background and training of coaches.

resultsEight hundred abstracts were initially identified through PubMed, with 284 full-text articles ultimately included. The majority (76%) were empirical articles. The literature operationalized health and wellness coaching as a process that is fully or partially patient-centered (86% of articles), included patient-determined goals (71%), incorporated self-discovery and active learning processes (63%) (vs more passive receipt of advice), encouraged accountability for behaviors (86%), and provided some type of education to patients along with using coaching processes (91%). Additionally, 78% of articles indicated that the coaching occurs in the context of a consistent, ongoing relationship with a human coach who is trained in specific behavior change, communication, and motivational skills.

conclusionsDespite disparities in how health and wellness coaching have been operationalized previously, this systematic review observes an emerging consensus in what is referred to as health and wellness coaching; namely, a patient-centered process that is based upon behavior change theory and is delivered by health professionals with diverse backgrounds. The actual coaching process entails goal-setting determined by the patient, encourages self-discovery in addition to content education, and incorporates mechanisms for developing accountability in health behaviors. With a clear definition for health and wellness coaching, robust research can more accurately assess the effectiveness of the approach in bringing about changes in health behaviors, health outcomes and associated costs that are targeted to reduce the global burden of chronic disease.

Indexed as

behavioral interventionbehavior changecoachinghealthSystematic reviewwellness

Identifiers

PMID24416684
PMCPMC3833550
OpenAlexW2065528066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.