Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24416670›Full record

ArticleGlobal advances in health and medicine2013

Health coaching and genomics-potential avenues to elicit behavior change in those at risk for chronic disease: protocol for personalized medicine effectiveness study in air force primary care.

Allison A Vorderstrasse, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, William E Kraus, Maj Carlos J Maldonado, Ruth Q Wolever

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global advances in health and medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01884545 nacompletednot on this map

Genetic Risk and Health Coaching for Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Heart Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2013 to 2017Enrolled220ConditionsCoronary Heart Disease, Susceptibility to, 5, Prediabetic StateArmsHealth coaching, Genetic risk counseling, Standard risk assessment
NCT02186327 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Community Coaching: Integrative Health Coaching Initiative for Behavior Change and Assessment of Perceived Needs in the Community Setting

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2014 to 2015Enrolled74ConditionsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeArmsIntegrative Health Coaching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of the Health Coach in a Global Pandemic.Global advances in health and medicine · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allison A VorderstrasseDuke University School of Nursing, United States.
Geoffrey S GinsburgInstitute for Genome Sciences & Policy, United States.
William E KrausDivision of Cardiology, Duke Schools of Medicine and Nursing, United States.
Maj Carlos J MaldonadoDavid Grant USAF Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, California, United States.
Ruth Q WoleverDuke Integrative Medicine, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Science, Duke School of Medicine, Center for Personalized Medicine, Duke University Health System, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType 2 diabetes (T2D) and coronary heart disease (CHD) are prevalent chronic diseases from which military personnel are not exempt. While many genetic markers for these diseases have been identified, the clinical utility of genetic risk testing for multifactorial diseases such as these has not been established. The need for a behavioral intervention such as health coaching following a risk counseling intervention for T2D or CHD also has not been explored. Here we present the rationale, design, and protocol for evaluating the clinical utility of genetic risk testing and health coaching for active duty US Air Force (AF) retirees and beneficiaries. PRIMARY STUDY

objectivesDetermine the direct and interactive effects of health coaching and providing genetic risk information when added to standard risk counseling for CHD and T2D on health behaviors and clinical risk markers.

designFour-group (2 X 2 factorial) randomized controlled trial.

settingTwo AF primary care clinical settings on the west coast of the United States.

participantsAdult AF primary care patients.

interventionAll participants will have a risk counseling visit with a clinic provider to discuss personal risk factors for T2D and CHD. Half of the participants (two groups) will also learn of their genetic risk testing results for T2D and CHD in this risk counseling session. Participants randomized to the two groups receiving health coaching will then receive telephonic health coaching over 6 months.

main outcome measuresBehavioral measures (self-reported dietary intake, physical activity, smoking cessation, medication adherence); clinical outcomes (AF composite fitness scores, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting glucose, lipids, T2D/CHD risk scores) and psychosocial measures (self-efficacy, worry, perceived risk) will be collected at baseline and 6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months.

conclusionThis study tests novel strategies deployed within existing AF primary care to increase adherence to evidence-based diet, physical activity, smoking cessation, and medication recommendations for CHD and T2D risk reduction through methods of patient engagement and self-management support.

Indexed as

behavior changechronic diseasecoronary heart diseasediabetesgenomicsHealth coaching

Identifiers

PMID24416670
PMCPMC3833533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.