Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24416543›Full record

ReviewReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2013

Prognostic factors and survival in metastatic breast cancer: A single institution experience.

Afef Khanfir, Faiez Lahiani, Racem Bouzguenda, Ines Ayedi, Jamel Daoud, Mounir Frikha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The different clonal origins of metachronous and synchronous metastases.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Thoracic cancer · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Effecst of Patho- Biological Factors on the Survival of Recurrent Breast Cancer CasesAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Afef KhanfirDepartment of Medical Oncology, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia.
Faiez LahianiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia.
Racem BouzguendaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia.
Ines AyediDepartment of Medical Oncology, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia.
Jamel DaoudDepartment of Radiotherapy, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia.
Mounir FrikhaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current retrospective study aims to identify some determinants of survival in metastatic breast cancer.

methodsThe study concerned 332 patients with synchronous (SM) or metachronous (MM) metastatic breast cancer treated between January 2000 and December 2007. Statistical comparison between subgroups of patients concerning survival was carried out employing log-rank test for the invariable analysis and Cox model for the multivariable analysis. Factors included: age group (≤50 years vs. >50; ≤70 years vs. >70; ≤35 years vs. >35), menopausal status, presentation of metastatic disease (SM vs. MM), disease free interval (DFI) (≤24 months vs. >24 months; ≤60 months vs. >60 months), performance status at diagnosis of metastatic disease (PS) (0-1 vs. >1), hormone receptors (HR), number of metastatic sites (1 site vs. >1), nature of the metastatic site (visceral vs. non visceral), first line therapy, surgery of the primary tumor (SPT), locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT) and use or not of bisphosphonates.

resultsOverall survival at 5 years was 12%. Positive prognostic factors in univariate analysis were: age ≤ 70 years, hormono-dependence of the tumor, good PS (PS 0-1), less than two metastatic sites, no visceral metastases, DFI ≥ 24 months, SPT or LRRT. In multivariate analysis, favorable independent prognostic factors included: good PS (PS 0-1), absence of visceral metastases (liver, lung, brain) and age ≤ 70 years.

conclusionMany of the prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer found in our study are known in the literature but some of them, like the application of locoregional treatment (radiotherapy or surgery) and the use of bisphosphonates, need to be further investigated in randomized clinical trials.

Indexed as

Breast cancerMetastasisPrognostic factorsSurvival

Identifiers

PMID24416543
PMCPMC3863182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.