Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24416541›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2013

Intraoperative radiation therapy as part of breast conserving therapy of early breast cancer-Results of one-year follow-up.

Zaneta Wareńczak-Florczak, Andrzej Roszak, Krystyna Bratos, Piotr Milecki, Aldona Karczewska-Dzionk, Hanna Włodarczyk

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Total skin electron irradiation-The technique where the electron beams are still irreplaceable.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2014
    Article
  5. Clinical and technological transition in breast cancer.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2013
    Review
  6. Practical issues regarding angular and energy response in in vivo intraoperative electron radiotherapy dosimetry.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zaneta Wareńczak-FlorczakGreater Poland Cancer Centre, Department of Gynaecological Radiotherapy and Oncology, Garbary Street 15, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.
Andrzej RoszakGreater Poland Cancer Centre, Department of Gynaecological Radiotherapy and Oncology, Garbary Street 15, 61-866 Poznan, Poland ; Karol Marcinkowski University of Medical Sciences, Department of Electroradiology, Garbary Street 15, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.
Krystyna BratosGreater Poland Cancer Centre, Department of Gynaecological Radiotherapy and Oncology, Garbary Street 15, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.
Piotr MileckiKarol Marcinkowski University of Medical Sciences, Department of Electroradiology, Garbary Street 15, 61-866 Poznan, Poland ; Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Garbary Street 15, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.
Aldona Karczewska-DzionkGreater Poland Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Garbary Street 15, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.
Hanna WłodarczykGreater Poland Cancer Centre, Department of Gynaecological Radiotherapy and Oncology, Garbary Street 15, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.
Greater Poland Cancer Center · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to assess the therapeutic effect of intraoperative radiotherapy, describe the method, and examine the occurrence of side effects and quality of life.

backgroundBreast conserving therapy has recently become a standard treatment modality in patients with early invasive cancer. Radiotherapy, along with surgery, is an integral part of such treatment. The important thing of radiotherapy is to deliver a high dose to the tumour bed. One of the methods is the intraoperative radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe analysis comprised sixty Tis-T2N0-1A breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving surgery. Patients' mean age was 57 years (range: 32-73 years). Intraoperative radiation therapy was delivered in the operating theatre during surgery and involved a single dose of 10 Gy with an electron beam of 4, 6, 9 or 12 MeV. After that, all patients were treated with whole breast irradiation. During one year observation photos and side effects examination were made.

resultsPhysical and imaging examinations performed during a one-year follow-up revealed no local or distant relapse and good tolerance of IORT. Acute mild responses to the radiotherapy occurred in 23.3% of patients. Based on the examination, a good and very good cosmetic effect was found in 78.3%, with 83.3% of patients evaluating their treatment effects in the same way.

conclusionsDue to its exceptional physical and radiobiological properties, intraoperative radiation therapy can be a good alternative to other methods of boosting dose to the post-operative site in management of low stage breast cancer, enabling a precise therapy to the tumour bed.

Indexed as

Breast conserving therapyCosmetic effectIntraoperative therapySide effects

Identifiers

PMID24416541
PMCPMC3863302
OpenAlexW2010981944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.