Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24416475›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2013

Standard Transgluteal versus Minimal Invasive Anterior Approach in hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Consecutive Cohort Study.

Thomas Ilchmann, Silke Gersbach, Lukas Zwicky, Martin Clauss

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02719236 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Direct Anterior Approach Versus Direct Lateral Approach in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorIuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and PharmacyRan2015 to 2020Enrolled112ConditionsCoxarthrosisArmsdirect anterior approach, direct lateral approach
NCT06538519 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Gait Analysis and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior and Lateral Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Prospective Randomized Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled34ConditionsHip OsteoarthritisArmstotal hip replacement using lateral approach, total hip replacement using anterior approach, gait analysis at 6wks, 3 months and 18 months
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Comparison of direct anterior, lateral, posterior and posterior-2 approaches in total hip arthroplasty: network meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Direct anterior approachWorld journal of orthopedics · 2021
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas IlchmannDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kantonsspital Baselland , Liestal, Switzerland.
Silke GersbachDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kantonsspital Baselland , Liestal, Switzerland.
Lukas ZwickyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kantonsspital Baselland , Liestal, Switzerland.
Martin ClaussDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kantonsspital Baselland , Liestal, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A minimally invasive anterior approach (MIS) was compared to a standard lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clinical and radiological outcomes were analyzed 6 weeks, 12 weeks, one year and two years after surgery. The duration of surgery was longer, mobility one week after surgery was better and time of hospitalization was shorter for minimally invasive-treated patients. They had less pain during movement, limping, better Harris Hip Score and satisfaction after 6 weeks, which remained after 12 weeks and 1 year, but not after two years. There were two deep infections in the MIS group. Radiological results were not affected. The infections might be a point of concern, but there were no other disadvantages of the MIS approach. In fact, early rehabilitation was facilitated and clinical results were improved. Our results encourage the continuous use of the MIS anterior approach instead of the lateral approach.

Indexed as

anterior approachearly rehabilitationhip replacementminimal invasive

Identifiers

PMID24416475
PMCPMC3883072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.