ArticlePloS one2014
Prediction of detailed enzyme functions and identification of specificity determining residues by random forests.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Upcycling Vegetable Waste Into Functional Food Ingredients via Synergistic Microbial Engineering and Artificial Intelligence.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Comparative Assessment of Protein Large Language Models for Enzyme Commission Number Prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Guided Protein Engineering.ACS catalysis · 2023Review
- Predicting enzymatic function of protein sequences with attention.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Improving automatic GO annotation with semantic similarity.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Review of Machine Learning Methods for the Prediction and Reconstruction of Metabolic Pathways.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- GrAPFI: predicting enzymatic function of proteins from domain similarity graphs.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Alignment-Free Method to Predict Enzyme Classes and Subclasses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Prediction of Enzyme Function Based on Three Parallel Deep CNN and Amino Acid Mutation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- ECPred: a tool for the prediction of the enzymatic functions of protein sequences based on the EC nomenclature.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- DEEPre: sequence-based enzyme EC number prediction by deep learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Insights into the evolution of enzyme substrate promiscuity after the discovery of (βα)₈ isomerase evolutionary intermediates from a diverse metagenome.BMC evolutionary biology · 2015Article
- Evolution of Enzyme Kinetic Mechanisms.Journal of molecular evolution · 2015Review
- The enzymatic nature of an anonymous protein sequence cannot reliably be inferred from superfamily level structural information alone.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2015Article
- A survey of computational intelligence techniques in protein function prediction.International journal of proteomics · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining enzyme functions is essential for a thorough understanding of cellular processes. Although many prediction methods have been developed, it remains a significant challenge to predict enzyme functions at the fourth-digit level of the Enzyme Commission numbers. Functional specificity of enzymes often changes drastically by mutations of a small number of residues and therefore, information about these critical residues can potentially help discriminate detailed functions. However, because these residues must be identified by mutagenesis experiments, the available information is limited, and the lack of experimentally verified specificity determining residues (SDRs) has hindered the development of detailed function prediction methods and computational identification of SDRs. Here we present a novel method for predicting enzyme functions by random forests, EFPrf, along with a set of putative SDRs, the random forests derived SDRs (rf-SDRs). EFPrf consists of a set of binary predictors for enzymes in each CATH superfamily and the rf-SDRs are the residue positions corresponding to the most highly contributing attributes obtained from each predictor. EFPrf showed a precision of 0.98 and a recall of 0.89 in a cross-validated benchmark assessment. The rf-SDRs included many residues, whose importance for specificity had been validated experimentally. The analysis of the rf-SDRs revealed both a general tendency that functionally diverged superfamilies tend to include more active site residues in their rf-SDRs than in less diverged superfamilies, and superfamily-specific conservation patterns of each functional residue. EFPrf and the rf-SDRs will be an effective tool for annotating enzyme functions and for understanding how enzyme functions have diverged within each superfamily.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.