Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24416118›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Cost-effectiveness of Tdap vaccination of adults aged ≥65 years in the prevention of pertussis in the US: a dynamic model of disease transmission.

Lisa J McGarry, Girishanthy Krishnarajah, Gregory Hill, Cristina Masseria, Michelle Skornicki, Narin Pruttivarasin, Bhakti Arondekar, Julie Roiz, Stephen I Pelton, Milton C Weinstein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical characteristics and pertussis costs in cases reported to epidemiological services and cases detected in household contacts in Catalonia (Spain).European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Prevention of pertussis through adult vaccination.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa J McGarryOptumInsight, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Girishanthy KrishnarajahGlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Gregory HillOptumInsight, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Cristina MasseriaGlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Michelle SkornickiOptumInsight, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Narin PruttivarasinOptumInsight, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Bhakti ArondekarGlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Julie RoizGlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Stephen I PeltonBoston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Milton C WeinsteinOptumInsight, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Harvard University, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
GlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USOptum (United States) · USBoston University · USHarvard University · USHealthInsight · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn February 2012, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) advised that all adults aged ≥65 years receive a single dose of reduced-antigen-content tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap), expanding on a 2010 recommendation for adults >65 that was limited to those with close contact with infants. We evaluated clinical and economic outcomes of adding Tdap booster of adults aged ≥65 to "baseline" practice [full-strength DTaP administered from 2 months to 4-6 years, and one dose of Tdap at 11-64 years replacing decennial Td booster], using a dynamic model.

methodsWe constructed a population-level disease transmission model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of supplementing baseline practice by vaccinating 10% of eligible adults aged ≥65 with Tdap replacing the decennial Td booster. US population effects, including indirect benefits accrued by unvaccinated persons, were estimated during a 1-year period after disease incidence reached a new steady state, with consequences of deaths and long-term pertussis sequelae projected over remaining lifetimes. Model outputs include: cases by severity, encephalopathy, deaths, costs (of vaccination and pertussis care) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with each strategy. Results in terms of incremental cost/QALY gained are presented from payer and societal perspectives. Sensitivity analyses vary key parameters within plausible ranges.

resultsFor the US population, the intervention is expected to prevent >97,000 cases (>4,000 severe and >5,000 among infants) of pertussis annually at steady state. Additional vaccination costs are $4.7 million. Net cost savings, including vaccination costs, are $47.7 million (societal perspective) and $44.8 million (payer perspective). From both perspectives, the intervention strategy is dominant (less costly, and more effective by >3,000 QALYs) versus baseline. Results are robust to sensitivity analyses and alternative scenarios.

conclusionsImmunization of eligible adults aged ≥65, consistent with the current ACIP recommendation, is cost saving from both payer and societal perspectives.

Indexed as

Models, EconomicAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineHumansUnited StatesVaccinationWhooping CoughDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID24416118
PMCPMC3886978
OpenAlexW2043535645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.