Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24416018›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2013

The potential of polymeric micelles in the context of glioblastoma therapy.

Ramin A Morshed, Yu Cheng, Brenda Auffinger, Michelle L Wegscheid, Maciej S Lesniak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Polymeric nanocarriers for therapeutic gene delivery.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. A Distinct Advantage to Intraarterial Delivery ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  12. The Extracellular Matrix and Biocompatible Materials in Glioblastoma Treatment.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  13. Advances in the design of solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers for targeting brain diseases.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ramin A MorshedThe Brain Tumor Center, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine Chicago, IL, USA.
Yu ChengThe Brain Tumor Center, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine Chicago, IL, USA.
Brenda AuffingerThe Brain Tumor Center, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine Chicago, IL, USA.
Michelle L WegscheidThe Brain Tumor Center, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine Chicago, IL, USA.
Maciej S LesniakThe Brain Tumor Center, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Magnetic-vortex microdiscs for glioma therapyR01NS077388 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LESNIAK, MACIEJ S · 2012 to 2015
$2.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS077388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), a type of malignant glioma, is the most common form of brain cancer found in adults. The current standard of care for GBM involves adjuvant temozolomide-based chemotherapy in conjunction with radiotherapy, yet patients still suffer from poor outcomes with a median survival of 14.6 months. Many novel therapeutic agents that are toxic to GBM cells in vitro cannot sufficiently accumulate at the site of an intracranial tumor after systemic administration. Thus, new delivery strategies must be developed to allow for adequate intratumoral accumulation of such therapeutic agents. Polymeric micelles offer the potential to improve delivery to brain tumors as they have demonstrated the capacity to be effective carriers of chemotherapy drugs, genes, and proteins in various preclinical GBM studies. In addition to this, targeting moieties and trigger-dependent release mechanisms incorporated into the design of these particles can promote more specific delivery of a therapeutic agent to a tumor site. However, despite these advantages, there are currently no micelle formulations targeting brain cancer in clinical trials. Here, we highlight key aspects of the design of polymeric micelles as therapeutic delivery systems with a review of their clinical applications in several non-brain tumor cancer types. We also discuss their potential to serve as nanocarriers targeting GBM, the major barriers preventing their clinical implementation in this disease context, as well as current approaches to overcome these limitations.

Indexed as

controlled releasedrug deliveryglioblastomamicellesnanoparticletargeted delivery

Identifiers

PMID24416018
PMCPMC3874582
OpenAlexW2137620081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.