Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24415955›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Single nucleus genome sequencing reveals high similarity among nuclei of an endomycorrhizal fungus.

Kui Lin, Erik Limpens, Zhonghua Zhang, Sergey Ivanov, Diane G O Saunders, Desheng Mu, Erli Pang, Huifen Cao, Hwangho Cha, Tao Lin and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
56.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 294 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring the potential role of fourFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Characterization of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Effector Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A transcriptional activator fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Kui LinLaboratory of Computational Molecular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Erik LimpensLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Plant Science, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Zhonghua ZhangInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops of Ministry of Agriculture, Sino-Dutch Joint Lab of Horticultural Genomics, Beijing, China.
Sergey IvanovLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Plant Science, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Diane G O SaundersThe Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Desheng MuNovome Biotech Inc., Zhongguancun Life Science Park, Beijing, China.
Erli PangLaboratory of Computational Molecular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Huifen CaoLaboratory of Computational Molecular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Hwangho ChaLaboratory of Computational Molecular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Tao LinInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops of Ministry of Agriculture, Sino-Dutch Joint Lab of Horticultural Genomics, Beijing, China.
Qian ZhouInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops of Ministry of Agriculture, Sino-Dutch Joint Lab of Horticultural Genomics, Beijing, China.
Yi ShangInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops of Ministry of Agriculture, Sino-Dutch Joint Lab of Horticultural Genomics, Beijing, China.
Ying LiInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops of Ministry of Agriculture, Sino-Dutch Joint Lab of Horticultural Genomics, Beijing, China.
Trupti SharmaLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Plant Science, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Robin van VelzenLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Plant Science, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Norbert de RuijterLaboratory of Cell Biology, Department of Plant Science, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Duur K AanenLaboratory of Genetics, Department of Plant Science, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Joe WinThe Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Sophien KamounThe Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Ton BisselingLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Plant Science, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands ; College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
René GeurtsLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Plant Science, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sanwen HuangInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops of Ministry of Agriculture, Sino-Dutch Joint Lab of Horticultural Genomics, Beijing, China ; Agricultural Genome Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Graduate School Experimental Plant Sciences · NLBeijing Normal University · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers · CNNorwich Research Park · GBSainsbury Laboratory · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclei of arbuscular endomycorrhizal fungi have been described as highly diverse due to their asexual nature and absence of a single cell stage with only one nucleus. This has raised fundamental questions concerning speciation, selection and transmission of the genetic make-up to next generations. Although this concept has become textbook knowledge, it is only based on studying a few loci, including 45S rDNA. To provide a more comprehensive insight into the genetic makeup of arbuscular endomycorrhizal fungi, we applied de novo genome sequencing of individual nuclei of Rhizophagus irregularis. This revealed a surprisingly low level of polymorphism between nuclei. In contrast, within a nucleus, the 45S rDNA repeat unit turned out to be highly diverged. This finding demystifies a long-lasting hypothesis on the complex genetic makeup of arbuscular endomycorrhizal fungi. Subsequent genome assembly resulted in the first draft reference genome sequence of an arbuscular endomycorrhizal fungus. Its length is 141 Mbps, representing over 27,000 protein-coding gene models. We used the genomic sequence to reinvestigate the phylogenetic relationships of Rhizophagus irregularis with other fungal phyla. This unambiguously demonstrated that Glomeromycota are more closely related to Mucoromycotina than to its postulated sister Dikarya.

Indexed as

Genome, FungalPhylogenyBase SequenceCell NucleusDNA, RibosomalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolecular Sequence DataMycorrhizaeOpen Reading FramesSpores, FungalDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID24415955
PMCPMC3886924
OpenAlexW2033598734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.