Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24415925›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Interference and shaping in sensorimotor adaptations with rewards.

Ran Darshan, Arthur Leblois, David Hansel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Somatic and Reinforcement-Based Plasticity in the Initial Stages of Human Motor Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Vocal generalization depends on gesture identity and sequence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ran DarshanEdmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel ; Laboratoire de Neurophysique et Physiologie UMR8119-CNRS Université René Descartes, Paris, France ; Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Arthur LebloisLaboratoire de Neurophysique et Physiologie UMR8119-CNRS Université René Descartes, Paris, France.
David HanselLaboratoire de Neurophysique et Physiologie UMR8119-CNRS Université René Descartes, Paris, France ; Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel ; The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a perturbation is applied in a sensorimotor transformation task, subjects can adapt and maintain performance by either relying on sensory feedback, or, in the absence of such feedback, on information provided by rewards. For example, in a classical rotation task where movement endpoints must be rotated to reach a fixed target, human subjects can successfully adapt their reaching movements solely on the basis of binary rewards, although this proves much more difficult than with visual feedback. Here, we investigate such a reward-driven sensorimotor adaptation process in a minimal computational model of the task. The key assumption of the model is that synaptic plasticity is gated by the reward. We study how the learning dynamics depend on the target size, the movement variability, the rotation angle and the number of targets. We show that when the movement is perturbed for multiple targets, the adaptation process for the different targets can interfere destructively or constructively depending on the similarities between the sensory stimuli (the targets) and the overlap in their neuronal representations. Destructive interferences can result in a drastic slowdown of the adaptation. As a result of interference, the time to adapt varies non-linearly with the number of targets. Our analysis shows that these interferences are weaker if the reward varies smoothly with the subject's performance instead of being binary. We demonstrate how shaping the reward or shaping the task can accelerate the adaptation dramatically by reducing the destructive interferences. We argue that experimentally investigating the dynamics of reward-driven sensorimotor adaptation for more than one sensory stimulus can shed light on the underlying learning rules.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryRewardAdaptation, PhysiologicalAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaBrainComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansLearningModels, NeurologicalMovementNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPsychomotor PerformanceReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID24415925
PMCPMC3886885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.