ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2014
Electronic health record: integrating evidence-based information at the point of clinical decision making.
Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Scope and Influence of Electronic Health Record-Integrated Clinical Decision Support in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.Annals of emergency medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Physicians' Perspectives on the Impact of Insurance Status on Clinical Decision-Making in Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2024Article
- Review
- Barriers to initiate buprenorphine and methadone for opioid use disorder treatment with postdischarge treatment linkage.Journal of hospital medicine · 2023Article
- DR.BENCH: Diagnostic Reasoning Benchmark for Clinical Natural Language Processing.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Article
- Evolution-revolution-devolution: a short history of the provision of knowledge-based information services to Manitoba's health professionals.The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2021Article
- Barriers and facilitators to promoting evidence uptake in Chinese medicine: a qualitative study in Hong Kong.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2021Article
- Why are they not accessing it? User barriers to clinical information access.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2021Article
- Advancing primary and community care for persons with spinal cord injury: Key findings from a Canadian summit.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2020Article
- Emerging roles of health information professionals for library and information science curriculum development: a scoping review.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2018Article
- The attitudes and beliefs of general practitioners towards clinical practice guidelines: a qualitative study in Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.Asia Pacific family medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The authors created two tools to achieve the goals of providing physicians with a way to review alternative diagnoses and improving access to relevant evidence-based library resources without disrupting established workflows. The “diagnostic decision support tool” lifted terms from standard, coded fields in the electronic health record and sent them to Isabel, which produced a list of possible diagnoses. The physicians chose their diagnoses and were presented with the “knowledge page,” a collection of evidence-based library resources. Each resource was automatically populated with search results based on the chosen diagnosis. Physicians responded positively to the “knowledge page.”
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.