Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24415439›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2014

New treatments for bladder cancer: when will we make progress?

Rosa Nadal, Joaquim Bellmunt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosa NadalSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Joaquim Bellmunt
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementThe prognosis and long-term survival for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients is poor. Traditionally, the mainstay of treatment has been combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin or with the classical M-VAC. Vinflunine has become an EMA-approved second-line option in Europe. Urothelial carcinomas contain genetic alteration in multiple genes that are potentially treated by targeted therapies. Recently, a number of these new therapies have been developed in this disease. But not one has been approved for clinical use in urothelial cancers. While clinical evaluation of these agents is still in its early days, some promising findings have begun to emerge. For example, everolimus demonstrated activity in those metastatic urothelial cancer patients who harbors TSC1 mutation. With the identification of the most relevant drug targets for tumors initiation and maintenance and the best way to assess drug candidates that may only account for a small fraction of patients, it is anticipated that the therapeutic arsenal for urothelial cancers will be expanded in the future.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeovascularization, PathologicSignal TransductionStress, PhysiologicalUrinary Bladder Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24415439
OpenAlexW2070672951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.