ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2014
Prognosis and health-related quality of life in elderly patients after a mild to moderate trauma.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of studies measuring health-related quality of life of general injury populations: update 2010-2018.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2020Pooled it
- Sex-Specific Factors Affecting Quality of Life After Major Trauma: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Registry-Based Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Adult and elderly population access to trauma centers: an ecological analysis evaluating the relationship between injury-related mortality and geographic proximity in the United States in 2010.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Utility of repeat head computed tomography after mild head trauma: influence on short- and long-term prognosis and health-related quality of life.Internal and emergency medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aims of this study were to compare outcome after a mild to moderate trauma in three subgroups of patients of increasing age (A1: <50, A2: 50-74, A3: >74 years) and to assess potential health-related quality of life (HRQOL) impairment. This is a follow-up study of a cohort of 418 trauma patients admitted to the High Dependency Unit of the Emergency Department of the University Hospital of Florence from July 2008 to February 2012. Six months after the event, a telephone interview using the Physical component summary (PCS) and Mental component summary (MCS) Health Composite Score (SF12) was conducted. Patients reported their QOL both at present and before trauma. In-hospital mortality was 10 of 418 (2.3 %); overall mortality was 27 of 244 (11 %) patients found at follow-up. No death was observed among A1 patients; overall mortality was (6/76) 7 % in A2 and (21/71) 30 % in A3 patients (p < 0.05 A1 vs A2, A1 vs A3 and A2 vs A3). Before the event, respectively, 94 and 96 % patients reported a normal MCS and PCS score (>39); after the event, the proportion of patients with a normal score value was significantly lower (MCS 70 %, p = 0.002; PCS 58 %, p < 0.0001). All subgroups showed a highly significant reduction in the scores' value due to the trauma. After the event, the proportion of patients with normal scores was significantly lower (all p < 0.0001, except for MCS score in A1 subgroup, who showed p = 0.013) within all subgroups. Elderly patients' prognosis was significantly worse compared with the younger counterpart; despite young patients' optimal outcome, HRQOL was uniformly reduced across all age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24415353What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.