ArticleDer Pathologe2014
[Determination of proliferation in breast cancer by immunohistochemical detection of Ki-67].
Article in Der Pathologe, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ki-67 assessment in early breast cancer: SAKK28/12 validation study on the IBCSG VIII and IBCSG IX cohort.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- [Update of the German S3 breast cancer guideline : What is new for pathologists?]Der Pathologe · 2019Article
- [Ki67: biological intertumor variance versus variance of assay].Der Pathologe · 2018Review
- A novel germline POLE mutation causes an early onset cancer prone syndrome mimicking constitutional mismatch repair deficiency.Familial cancer · 2017Article
- Standardization for Ki-67 assessment in moderately differentiated breast cancer. A retrospective analysis of the SAKK 28/12 study.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene expression profiling has demonstrated the prognostic relevance of genes associated with proliferation in breast cancer. The immunohistochemical marker Ki-67 enables routine assessment of proliferation activity in pathology. In a number of retrospective but only few prospective studies the prognostic relevance of Ki-67 in breast cancer could be shown. Although there is no standardized approach with regard to which area of a histological section and how many cells should be counted in a quantitative or semiquantitative fashion as well as to the threshold, Ki-67 is broadly applied in breast pathology. This can be explained by the good reproducibility of the degree of proliferation assessed by Ki-67, at least in the low and high ranges, the possibility to substantiate grading and better practicability in core biopsies in comparison to mitotic counting. In neoadjuvant therapy of hormone receptor positive breast cancer, Ki-67 can probably predict the efficacy of pure hormone receptor blockade without chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.