ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
An analysis of the most-cited research papers on oncology: which journals have they been published in?
Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fifty Most-Cited Research Articles in Elbow Surgery: A Modern Reading List.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2023Article
- Mapping the global research landscape on insulin resistance: Visualization and bibliometric analysis.World journal of diabetes · 2022Article
- Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery-A Bibliometric Study on 30 Years of Research Activity.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Prediction of Infectious Diseases: A Bibliometric Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
- Bibliometric Analysis of 100 Top-Cited Articles in Gastric Disease.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- The impact of the open-access status on journal indices: oncology journals.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019Article
- The 100 most cited manuscripts in esophageal motility disorders: a bibliometric analysis.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- The 100 most influential manuscripts on hepatocellular carcinoma: a bibliometric analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2019Review
- Altmetric Versus Bibliometric Perspective Regarding Publication Impact and Force.World journal of surgery · 2018Article
- Fifty top-cited spine articles from mainland China: A citation analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2018Article
- Factors associated with online media attention to research: a cohort study of articles evaluating cancer treatments.Research integrity and peer review · 2017Article
- The 100 most cited articles investigating the radiological staging of oesophageal and junctional cancer: a bibliometric analysis.Insights into imaging · 2016Article
- Global research trends of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a bibliometric analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2016Article
- Classic Citations in Main Primary Health Care Journals: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis.Medicine · 2015Article
- The 50 Most-cited Articles in Orthopaedic Surgery From Mainland China.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The most-cited papers (MCPs) are likely those that impressed researchers and had profound influence on clinical practice or future developments in the related scientific field. This study was conducted to explore a bibliometric approach to assess where the oncology-related MCPs have been published in. The source of the data presented in this study was provided by using the InCitesTM, Web of Science, Thomson Reuters Database (2013). It contained any journal indexed by ISI between 1979 and 2013. The term MCPs arbitrarily defined as equal or more than 100 citations. A total of 565 publications were cited equal or more than 100 times. They were published in 79 different journals (64 oncology, 12 medicine, and 3 science), led by the Journal of Clinical Oncology (n = 76; 13.5%) and Cancer Research (n = 66; 11.7%) followed by Oncogene (n = 46; 8.1%), Nature Reviews Cancer (n = 41; 7.3%), and Cancer (n = 37; 6.5%). Moreover, the journal categories with the MCPs were the Oncology with 495 articles (87.6%), followed by the Medicine with 60 (10.6%) articles. However, the numbers of journals related to Science (n = 10; 1.8%) were the least. The MCPs were cited a total of 118,531 times. The citations ranged from 100 to 1,790, and the median number was 149. The total numbers of MCPs were the most prominent for the journals, the New England Journal of Medicine (median 398), Lancet (median 213), and Nature Reviews Cancer (median 210). In other side, the counts of MCPs were the highest for the Science and Medicine-categorized journals (median 212.5 and 192.5 citations, respectively). The MCPs categorized as Oncology were the least cited (median 145). The median number of MCPs per year was 18.7 with range 4.1-858.5. The annual most valuable MCPs were also published in the journal Nature Reviews Cancer (median 42) and the New England Journal of Medicine (median 38.7). Likewise, the numbers of MCPs were the highest for the Science-categorized journals (median 37), whereas the citations per year were significantly lower in Medicine and Oncology-categorized journals (25.8 and 17.8, respectively). In conclusion, most of the MCPs were published in Oncology specialized journals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24414487What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.