Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2014
The Rotaglide mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no difference between cemented and hybrid implantation.
Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation of revision rate of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of clinical studies and worldwide arthroplasty registers.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Patella is rarely resurfaced during primary total knee arthroplasty in clinical trials conducted in Greece: a systematic review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Pooled it
- No differences in clinical outcomes between fixed- and mobile-bearing computer-assisted total knee arthroplasties and no correlations between navigation data and clinical scores.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015Trial
- Long-Term Outcomes of Cementless Versus Hybrid Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comparative assessment of different reconstructive techniques of distal femur in revision total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017Article
- Comparison of ultra-congruent mobile- and fixed-bearing navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty with minimum 5-year follow-up.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016Article
- Extent of vertical cementing as a predictive factor for radiolucency in revision total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe optimal fixation of the Rotaglide total knee arthroplasty's (TKA) components is controversial. It is hypothesized that the hybrid fixation (cementless femoral component) in a mobile-bearing TKA system might cause increased rate of loosening--especially in the femoral part--and finally failure of the arthroplasty. Consequently, the aim of this study was to compare the survival and revision rates and also the clinical and radiological outcomes of the cemented and hybrid fixation of the Rotaglide TKA.
methodsOne hundred patients, who underwent TKA with the Rotaglide prosthesis, were randomly placed in two groups. In the first group, the prosthesis was cemented, and in the second group, the hybrid technique was used. Revision and mortality rates were compared after 8-12 years of follow-up. Knee and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire and the Knee Society Roentgenographic Evaluation and Scoring System were used to demonstrate clinical and radiographic differences.
resultsThere were no statistically significant differences in revision (n.s.) or mortality (n.s.) rates between the two treatment arms. The clinical outcome at the time of last follow-up (mean 9.5 years, SD ± 1.4) ranged from very good to excellent (77.8 ± 17.5 for the cemented group and 77.2 ± 20.4 for the hybrid group). No statistically significant differences in all KOOS subscales. Radiographs showed no significant difference in prosthesis alignment and no evidence of loosening between groups.
conclusionThe hypothesis that the hybrid fixation in a mobile-bearing TKA system might cause increased rate of loosening and finally failure of the arthroplasty was not confirmed. The fixation technique (cemented or hybrid) had no influence on the prosthesis's survivorship, and also on mortality rates, clinical and radiographic outcomes in a mean follow-up time of 9.5 ± 1.4 years. The Rotaglide TKA is a safe and reliable prosthesis regardless the fixation technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.