Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24414230›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2014

AT(2) receptor and tissue injury: therapeutic implications.

Pawel Namsolleck, Chiara Recarti, Sébastien Foulquier, Ulrike Muscha Steckelings, Thomas Unger

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The Renin Angiotensin System as a Therapeutic Target in Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Angiotensin ATPharmacological reviews · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pawel NamsolleckCARIM - School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Chiara Recarti
Sébastien Foulquier
Ulrike Muscha Steckelings
Thomas Unger
Maastricht University · NLUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays an important role in the initiation and progression of tissue injuries in the cardiovascular and nervous systems. The detrimental actions of the AT1 receptor (AT1R) in hypertension and vascular injury, myocardial infarction and brain ischemia are well established. In the past twenty years, protective actions of the RAS, not only in the cardiovascular, but also in the nervous system, have been demonstrated. The so-called protective arm of the RAS includes AT2-receptors and Mas receptors (AT2R and MasR) and is characterized by effects different from and often opposing those of the AT1R. These include anti-inflammation, anti-fibrosis, anti-apoptosis and neuroregeneration that can counterbalance pathological processes and enable recovery from disease. The recent development of novel, small-molecule AT2R agonists offers a therapeutic potential in humans with a variety of clinical indications.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansHypertensionProto-Oncogene MasReceptor, Angiotensin, Type 1Receptor, Angiotensin, Type 2Renin-Angiotensin SystemSignal TransductionMAS1 protein, humanProto-Oncogene MasReceptor, Angiotensin, Type 1Receptor, Angiotensin, Type 2

Identifiers

PMID24414230
PMCPMC3906548
OpenAlexW2138101248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.