Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24413880›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in brain death.

M Luchtmann, O Beuing, M Skalej, J Kohl, S Serowy, J Bernarding, R Firsching

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Ancillary tests for brain death.Frontiers in neurology · 2024
    Review
  3. Brain death: a clinical overview.Journal of intensive care · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M LuchtmannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg.
O BeuingInstitute of Neuroradiology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg.
M SkalejInstitute of Neuroradiology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg.
J KohlDepartment of Neurosurgery, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg.
S SerowyInstitute of Neuroradiology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg.
J BernardingInstitute of Biometry and Medical Informatics, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg.
R FirschingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg.
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Confirmatory tests for the diagnosis of brain death in addition to clinical findings may shorten observation time required in some countries and may add certainty to the diagnosis under specific circumstances. The practicability of Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography to confirm cerebral circulatory arrest was assessed after the diagnosis of brain death in 15 patients using a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner. In all 15 patients extracranial blood flow distal to the external carotid arteries was undisturbed. In 14 patients no contrast medium was noted within intracerebral vessels above the proximal level of the intracerebral arteries. In one patient more distal segments of the anterior and middle cerebral arteries (A3 and M3) were filled with contrast medium. Gadolinium-enhanced MRA may be considered conclusive evidence of cerebral circulatory arrest, when major intracranial vessels fail to fill with contrast medium while extracranial vessels show normal blood flow.

Indexed as

GadoliniumAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain DeathCerebrovascular CirculationContrast MediaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultContrast MediaGadolinium

Identifiers

PMID24413880
PMCPMC3888970
OpenAlexW1976334622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.