ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2014
[Calories, proteins - what does the intensive care patient need?].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of selenium on early outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation : A preliminary report from a retrospective data evaluation.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is increasingly recognized that the nutrition of critically ill patients is a highly complex activity with many unanswered questions. Much research has been performed showing that early enteral nutrition helps to avoid complications. In addition, it has already been shown that the calorie goal as the sole diet goal rather plays a minor role, if one pays attention to sufficient supply of proteins. The diet of the different patient groups with their very individual physiological conditions and their very different diseases are another difficile question in nutritional therapy. The question about the best access path currently appears clearly to be the way of enteral nutrition. Although there seems to be no clear advantage to the gastric or jejunal route, the gastric tube is apparently used more often in clinical practice due to the ease of placement. Reflux control is also currently controversially discussed. To assess the intestinal transport capacity, control of reflux is inevitable, but the amount of reflux that should be considered as cut-off criteria is still unclear. The field of immunonutrition or the substitution of selenium, glutamine, and other substances requires further research. The goal of this article is to provide the reader with a review of the current literature concerning nutritional needs of intensive care patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24413834What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.