Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24413284›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2014

A mixed methods analysis of support for self-management behaviors: perspectives of people with epilepsy and their support providers.

Elizabeth Reisinger Walker, George Engelhard, Christina Barmon, Robin E McGee, Claire E Sterk, Colleen Diiorio, Nancy J Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth Reisinger WalkerRollins School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University, USA. Electronic address: ereisin@emory.edu.
George EngelhardDivision of Educational Studies, Emory University, USA.
Christina BarmonDepartment of Sociology, Georgia State University, USA.
Robin E McGeeRollins School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University, USA.
Claire E SterkRollins School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University, USA.
Colleen DiiorioRollins School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University, USA.
Nancy J ThompsonRollins School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University, USA.
Emory University · USGeorgia State University · US

Funding

IRACDA Fellowships in Research and Science Training (FIRST)K12GM000680 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, LOU ANN S, MCCARTY, NAEL A · 2000 to 2024
$41.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM000680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social support is associated with improved self-management for people with chronic conditions, such as epilepsy; however, little is known about the perceived ease or difficulty of receiving and providing support for epilepsy self-management. We examined patterns of epilepsy self-management support from the perspectives of both people with epilepsy and their support persons. Fifty-three people with epilepsy and 48 support persons completed a survey on epilepsy self-management support. Of these individuals, 22 people with epilepsy and 16 support persons completed an in-depth interview. Rasch measurement models were used to evaluate the degree of difficulty of receiving or providing support often for nine self-management tasks. We analyzed model-data fit, person and item location along the support latent variable and differential person and item functioning. Qualitative methods were used to provide context and insight into the quantitative results. The results demonstrated good model-data fit. Help with seizures was the easiest type of support to receive or provide more often, followed by rides to a doctor's appointments and help avoiding seizure triggers. The most difficult types of support to receive or provide more often were reminders, particularly for taking and refilling medications. While most participants' responses fit the model, responses of several individuals misfit the model. Person misfit generally occurred because the scale items did not adequately capture some individuals' behaviors. These results could be useful in designing interventions that use support as a means of improving self-management. Additionally, the results provide information to improve or expand current measures of support for epilepsy self-management to better assess the experiences of people with epilepsy and their support persons.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDepressionEpilepsyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf CareSocial SupportYoung AdultEpilepsyMixed methodsRasch analysisSelf-managementSocial support

Identifiers

PMID24413284
PMCPMC4152858
OpenAlexW2043776702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.