Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24412641›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2014

How multi-organ microdevices can help foster drug development.

Mandy B Esch, Alec S T Smith, Jean-Matthieu Prot, Carlota Oleaga, James J Hickman, Michael L Shuler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Grand challenges in organoid and organ-on-a-chip technologies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mandy B EschDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, 115 and 305 Weill Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Alec S T SmithNanoScience Technology Center, University of Central Florida, 12424 Research Parkway Suite 401, Orlando, FL 32828, USA.
Jean-Matthieu ProtDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, 115 and 305 Weill Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Carlota OleagaNanoScience Technology Center, University of Central Florida, 12424 Research Parkway Suite 401, Orlando, FL 32828, USA.
James J HickmanNanoScience Technology Center, University of Central Florida, 12424 Research Parkway Suite 401, Orlando, FL 32828, USA.
Michael L ShulerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, 115 and 305 Weill Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Electronic address: mls50@cornell.edu.

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143876 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SHULER, MICHAEL L · 2009 to 2014
$12.6M
An In Vitro Model of Stem Cell Innervation of MyotubesR01NS050452 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI HICKMAN, JAMES J · 2005 to 2020
$6.4M
Microphysiologial systems and low cost microfluidic platform with analyticsUH2TR000516 · NCATS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI HICKMAN, JAMES J, SHULER, MICHAEL L · 2012 to 2014
$2.9M
Functional Invitro CNS and PNS Myelination ModelR01EB009429 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI LAMBERT, STEPHEN · 2010 to 2013
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UH2 TR000516NCATS NIH HHS UH2TR000516NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143876NCI NIH HHS U54CA143876NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009429NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB009429NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050452NINDS NIH HHS R01NS050452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-organ microdevices can mimic tissue-tissue interactions that occur as a result of metabolite travel from one tissue to other tissues in vitro. These systems are capable of simulating human metabolism, including the conversion of a pro-drug to its effective metabolite as well as its subsequent therapeutic actions and toxic side effects. Since tissue-tissue interactions in the human body can play a significant role in determining the success of new pharmaceuticals, the development and use of multi-organ microdevices present an opportunity to improve the drug development process. The devices have the potential to predict potential toxic side effects with higher accuracy before a drug enters the expensive phase of clinical trials as well as to estimate efficacy and dose response. Multi-organ microdevices also have the potential to aid in the development of new therapeutic strategies by providing a platform for testing in the context of human metabolism (as opposed to animal models). Further, when operated with human biopsy samples, the devices could be a gateway for the development of individualized medicine. Here we review studies in which multi-organ microdevices have been developed and used in a ways that demonstrate how the devices' capabilities can present unique opportunities for the study of drug action. We will also discuss challenges that are inherent in the development of multi-organ microdevices. Among these are how to design the devices, and how to create devices that mimic the human metabolism with high authenticity. Since single organ devices are testing platforms for tissues that can later be combined with other tissues within multi-organ devices, we will also mention single organ devices where appropriate in the discussion.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Culture TechniquesDrug DiscoveryHumansOrgan Culture TechniquesProdrugsProdrugsBody-on-a-chipMicro-cell culture analogs of PBPKsMicrophysiological systemsMPSMulti-organ microdevicesμCCAs

Identifiers

PMID24412641
PMCPMC4095890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.